10 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

received before or at the Zoning Administrator hearing are attached to this staff report as Attachment E. The Zoning Administrator added several conditions to the project. The additional conditions consisted of: • clarification of the size and orientation of the bathroom windows on the second floor; • a reduction in the size of the bedroom window that faces the neighbors to the south without compromising ability to meet emergency egress requirements as stipulated by the Building Division; • clarification that proposed landscape screening along the southern property line be located in- between existing landscaping and vegetation; • clarification to allow a combination of species for the proposed landscape screening or to allow another type of species that is fast - growing and minimizes leaf litter; • the applicant may add a one -story roof over the porch area to enhance the front facade and for weather protection. The Zoning Administrator approved the project subject to the revised conditions. NEIGHBORS' COMMENTS AFTER THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING Ms. Terry Young, owner of 6126 Homer Court, submitted an email to staff in support of the project. Ms. Young's property is located directly west of the subject property. Ms. Young's correspondence is attached to this report. In response to the Perry's appeal, staff visited the residence of Mr. Joe and TinaMarie Perry (6104 Homer Court) to consider their comments and concerns regarding the proposal. As stated by Mr. and Ms. Perry before the Zoning Administrator hearing and in their appeal letter, their concern is regarding the second -story portion of the proposal that is closest to their property. The Perrys have stated that the proposed addition will cause shadowing and shading of their property and will impact the view from their front room window. They have also commented that the proposed addition will make their house appear more recessed from the street and reduce the value of the property. Additionally, they are concerned that the view from their kitchen window would be impacted since it faces towards the subject property. In reply to the concern about views of the proposed addition, Mr. and Ms. Lopez have offered to plant landscape screening near the mutual side property line, but Mr. and Ms. Perry do not find that this alternative is a suitable solution for their concerns. Additionally, Mr. Lopez has indicated that the combination of trees located on the Perry's property, his property, and Ms. Young's property shade the Perry's home for the majority of the day. Case No. PAP -146, Appeal of PADR -2090 Planning Commission Page 7 of 17