My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 031010
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
PC 031010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
1/4/2011 10:43:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/10/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
5. CONSENT CALENDAR <br />There were no Consent Calendar Items. <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br />Matter Continued for Decision <br />a. PAP-140 through PAP-144, Phil Benzel, Robert Miller, and Todd Briggs, <br />Appellants (PDR-883 through PDR-887, Ponderosa Homes, Applicant) <br />Appeal of the Zoning Administrator’s Design Review approvals to <br />construct five single-family homes on five vacant lots located at <br />6120 Sanctuary Lane, 6136 Sanctuary Lane, 6168 Sanctuary Lane, <br />6184 Sanctuary Lane, and 6139 Sanctuary Lane, in the Happy Valley <br />Specific Plan Area. Zoning for the properties is PUD-SRDR (Planned <br />Unit Development – Semi-Rural Density Residential) District. <br />Brian Dolan indicated that the Commissioners have been provided with the materials <br />they requested at the last meeting as well as new material provided by the appellant. <br />He noted that there were two points were raised at the last meeting: (1) whether <br />custom homes are allowed in the development; and (2) whether the proposed house <br />designs conform to “custom.” <br />With respect to the first point, Mr. Dolan stated that there are many references to <br />“custom lots” in the design guidelines and the conditions of approval, but nowhere are <br />there references requiring the houses in the development be custom homes. <br />As regards the second point, Mr. Dolan stated that in comparing the proposed homes to <br />the design guidelines, staff maintains its conclusion that they are custom enough to be <br />approved within the framework of the existing approved project. He noted that there are <br />five lots with three floor plans, with two pairs sharing the same floor plans. He added <br />that the two sets of homes with the same floor plans have different design styles, <br />materials used, and rooflines which distinguish them from each other. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Todd Briggs, Appellant, recapped the appellants’ position as presented at the last <br />meeting and reviewed several documents referring to the lots within the development as <br />“custom home sites.” He stated that they did additional research after the last <br />Commission meeting and found two other documents, which were provided in the <br />binder of documents they had provided the Commissioners, that they believe show that <br />the only custom homes, and no tract or production homes, were intended for the <br />Serenity development. <br />Mr. Briggs then related the history of the Serenity project, which was originally owned by <br />TTK Partnership in 1999 and subsequently purchased by Don Babbitt. He noted that in <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 10, 2010 Page 3 of 25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.