My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 112502
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 112502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:47:57 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:49:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/25/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 112502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,- <br /> <br />He stated that if the Energy Plan is adopted it will help locally. He advised that he would like to <br />see the Plan moving forward before he is satisfied that we don't have an issue with air quality. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan stated that the third issue is schools. He advised that the General Plan <br />states that the goal is 600 students for an elementary school. He reported that the school <br />district's forecast presented at the school board meeting a couple of weeks ago shows that with <br />nine schools the average enrollment is 674 students. He further reported that the information <br />indicates that in 2005, with the opening of Neal School, the average will be 619, and without <br />Neal School it will be 688. He advised that even with the opening of Neal School the average <br />elementary school enrollment will be over the General Plan goal. Commissioner Sullivan <br />commented that based on the history of the school district, he does not have a high level of <br />confidence that Neal School will open in 2005, <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan advised that he has these three infrastructure issues with the Growth <br />Management Report and he is not ready to say that he will support the allocations that are <br />proposed. He stated that he would like to propose an alternative to what is in the report. <br /> <br />Commissioners Kameny and Roberts excused themselves from the dais, noting that they own <br />property within 500 feet ofthe projects that are being considered for growth management <br />allocations. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift clarified that the Growth Management Report traffic analysis does not assume the <br />completion of the West Las Positas Interchange or Stoneridge Drive extension, and that with all <br />r- of the approved commercial projects and the residential projects that currently have growth <br />management approval the study shows that LOS D or better can still be achieved. Mr. Swift <br />advised that with regard to regional improvements, both 1-580 and 1-680 are at LOS E over <br />major segments of their routes and there are no scheduled improvements that will decrease the <br />congestion. <br /> <br />Mr. Swift reported that the Energy Plan is currently scheduled for review by the City Council on <br />December 3. With regard to schools, Mr. Swift advised that when the 1992 agreement was <br />reached between the school district and the developers, the school district's master plan specified <br />that new elementary schools be no greater than 650 students. That agreement also established <br />"capacities" for the existing schools, almost all of which exceeded 650 students, These larger <br />capacities were to be retained; new development was to pay for capacity needs beyond "what <br />existed." He further advised that the school district's modified policy is for a target of 600- <br />student schools with a ten percent factor that would allow them to go to 660 students. He noted <br />that the school board's current policy is to try and have all of the elementary schools reduced in <br />size and the district is moving to make the elementary schools smaller as they renovate the <br />schools. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that the City has entered into development agreements in order to <br />attempt to build the Vineyard Corridor out in an orderly fashion and to get the infrastructure and <br />school in place. He further noted that it appears that the school district has dropped out of the <br />agreement, but he does not feel the City should drop out of the agreements. He stated that he is <br />proposing that the Planning Commission honor the growth management allocations and requests <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />November 25, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.