PC 102302 - Laserfiche WebLink

r adaptive reuse of historic buildings was something that was discussed extensively by the Downtown Specific Plan Committee. While it was recognized that Downtown's historic buildings and architecture contributed significantly to the area, and that they should be retained, the Committee and the Plan did recognize the need to make the buildings in Downtown functional. When modifications to existing buildings were proposed, they would be acceptable if those modifications were consistent with the design detail of the historic building. Mr. Iserson noted that the new Downtown Design Guidelines were not yet approved by the City, but were recommended by the Specific Plan Committee and the PDA. They recognized the importance of storefront windows in attracting customers. In terms of the existing design guidelines, its position on storefront displays is similar. Mr. Iserson noted that the Draft Historic Preservation Ordinance, still undergoing public review, addressed modifications to historic resources. The Ordinance stated that there should be minimal changes to the materials, that the historic character be retained, that historic features of the building be repaired, that historic spatial relationships and proportions be maintained with any modifications, and that the new work be compatible with the historic integrity of the building. Staff believed that the proposed window modifications would accomplish those goals, and that the result would be attractive, functional, and in keeping with the style of the building. r- Mr. Iserson believed that the neon tubing would be a precedent for downtown buildings, and added that staff had not allowed other businesses to install neon bands around the tops of the buildings. The PDA has not supported that design element, and staff believed that type of lighting would not be appropriate for the building. Staff suggested the use of gooseneck lamps, wall sconces, or lanterns mounted to the building. There were many lighting options available to the applicant that would be consistent with keeping the downtown flavor. Mr. Iserson advised that the Downtown Association Design Committee examined this proposal twice, voting in favor of lowering the sills on September 3, 2002, providing the design and architecture were compatible with the existing windows. The entire PDA Board voted in favor of the modifications again on September 26, 2002. Mr. Iserson noted that there had been some public comment on this item. Staff believed that in balancing the needs of preserving historic buildings and making them functional and useful for the downtown businesses, that the proposal was acceptable. The window treatment, including the recessed windows and sill and matching mullions, would be compatible with the building, would not destroy the historic integrity of the building, and would result in a building that would be attractive. Staff did not support the neon tube banding. The color of the new awnings were originally to be black, but was changed to a mauve color. Staff was concerned that mauve awnings would not match the greens and tans proposed for the building walls. The Commission may wish to comment on that item, or the applicant may address it with staff in the PDA. Staff recommended approval of the design review application to modify the windows as shown on the exhibits, including the deletion of the neon tube banding. - PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES October 23,2002 Page 21