My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092502
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 092502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:56 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Maier noted that when discussing the ordinance, the first question asked was <br />r regarding the nature of Green Building, and why it was required. She noted that it was a <br />whole systems approach to the design, construction, and operation of buildings that <br />typically incorporated the following elements: <br /> <br />I. Sustainable site planning to reduce the impact of the building on the <br />environment (reducing stormwater runoff, siting the building for solar <br />access or easy access to mass transit); <br />2. Water and energy efficiency; <br />3. Materials and resource conservation (using recycled materials in the <br />building construction, recycling of construction and demolition waste); <br />4. Indoor air quality (better ventilation and acoustics, more natural lighting, <br />the use of finishes and paints without volatile or organic compounds); <br /> <br />Ms. Maier noted that the idea of green building incorporated such elements into the <br />design of the building and the materials used, as well as the operation of the building <br />regarding energy and water consumption over the lifetime of the building. <br /> <br />Ms. Maier noted that there were obvious benefits of building green, including the <br />negative impact on natural resources, water, and energy. The health and safety benefits <br />included a better indoor environment for employees, which enhanced occupant comfort <br />and health. Community and social benefits included the reduction of public and <br />infrastructure costs related to development, the proximity to mass transit, and the <br />r- provision of bike racks and showers. Front-end expenditures for materials and analyses <br />are traded for an economic benefit over the lifetime of the building with reduced <br />operating costs. In particular, civic structures produce a definite economic benefit for <br />building green. <br /> <br />Ms. Maier noted that they chose to use the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED rating <br />system as a measure of green building. She added that the LEED rating system was <br />accepted nationally used by many cities in the country after extensive research. She <br />noted that the USGBC had more than 700 members, including architects, builders, <br />manufacturers, institutions such as universities, federal, state and local governments, <br />including the City of Pleasant on. The Green Building System was developed in a <br />consensus fashion so that each member had a say in its organization. <br /> <br />Ms. Maier added that the Green Building System was also performance based, which <br />allows developers the flexibility to determine which credits they will use to meet the <br />rating standard that was chosen. The system is based on acceptable energy practices, and <br />evaluated the projected life cycles of the building to provide a better definition of green <br />building. The LEED scorecard is an easy way to determine the relative greenness of a <br />project; for instance, a Platinum building would be far superior to a Certified Building. <br />The four levels of certification included: <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Certified Level (minimum of26 credits): required by the City as currently <br />proposed for buildings exceeding 20,000 square feet; <br /> <br />r-t <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September 25, 2002' <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.