My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 092502
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 092502
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:56 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:41:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/25/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 092502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />r- Connnissioner Sullivan supported staff's recommendation to not include a cost hardship <br />exemption. Developers had already found ways to make green building compliance cost- <br />effective. He did not believe the free market would make changes like this willingly or <br />soon, and believed that deviation from the business status quo needed goverrnnent <br />encouragement for any real change to be effected. He did not believe that the free market <br />as described by the EVC really exists in present day society. He believed that existing <br />construction and energy industry practices were supported and encouraged by significant <br />subsidies, tax breaks, and goverrnnent policies. He believed that goverrnnent actions such <br />as this helped to level the playing field, and provided a fair market for those industries to <br />compete. <br /> <br />Connnissioner Sullivan wholeheartedly supported incentives for business and developers <br />for implementation of the green building practices, but he did not believe they belonged in <br />the Ordinance, which should exist to establish the rules. He noted that the Energy <br />Advisory Group had developed an energy plan that addresses incentives and other <br />programs to encourage energy efficient practices. He urged support for its adoption, so <br />that additional incentives may be provided to businesses and developers. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />Connnissioner Sullivan recommended approval of the Green Building Ordinance because <br />of the benefits to the community, the environment, and to future generations. He believed <br />that goverrnnent should facilitate positive change such as the Green Building Ordinance. <br />He also recommended that all new City facilities should be built to LEED Gold or <br />Platinum standards, and that they should contain a significant renewable energy <br />component in the project. He believed that the new Civic Center and eventual public <br />buildings on the Bernal property should be included in that category. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas suggested that the City should strive for a Silver level. <br /> <br />Connnissioner Sullivan believed that the City should lead by example, and should set the <br />bar in its LEED standards. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas wished to thank Commissioner Sullivan for his considerable efforts in <br />bringing the Green Building Ordinance forward. <br /> <br />Connnissioner Arkin agreed with Connnissioner Sullivan's comments regarding the <br />benefits of the Green Building Ordinance, and was in complete support of its adoption. <br /> <br />Connnissioner Roberts agreed with Connnissioners Sullivan and Arkin. and supported the <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas noted that projects of 20,000 square feet and under should exercise <br />their best efforts in achieving the Certified Level. She agreed with the idea of incentives <br />and streamlining of the checklist process. She noted that Ms. Maier had assured her that <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September 25, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.