My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 091102
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
PC 091102
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:46:46 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 8:38:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/11/2002
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 091102
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />water tank property would be combined with 27 Grey Eagle Court, which would <br />recognize that the five to six acre portion of property previous owned by Mr. Berloger <br />(which was recently combined with 27 Grey Eagle Court) would be required to remove it <br />from the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan, and to remove that designation from the <br />property. <br /> <br />This ultimate result would require the following actions by the City: <br /> <br />I. General Plan conformity determination that the former Berlager piece, <br />now within 27 Grey Eagle Court, is Rural Density on the General Plan, <br />and no longer has a Specific Plan designation; <br />2. The Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan would be amended to <br />exclude the former Berlager piece from that Specific Plan area; <br />3. Rezoning that area to PUD-LDR, the Grey Eagle Development zoning; <br />4. Modify the Grey Eagle PUD Development Plan to recognize the new lot <br />lines; <br />5. Modify the Grey Eagle PUD Development Plan to relocate the building <br />site for 24 Grey Eagle Court to the location next to the City water tank; <br />6. Modify the PUD to slightly expand the building envelope at 28 Grey <br />Eagle Court. <br /> <br />,,-- <br /> <br />The General Plan determination is based on the fact that the General Plan is a general <br />document, and the map is subject to interpretation and clarification in many areas. The <br />intent was normally for General Plan designation changes to occur at property lines. <br />Since the Berlager piece was added to 27 Grey Eagle Court, the property line changed. <br />When it was merged, the City did not change the General Plan designation at that time, <br />and staff believes that this would be an appropriate time to clarify that property line. Staff <br />asked the Commission, and ultimately the Council, to make the determination that the <br />entire Lot 27, which currently has two land use designations, to be under the Rural <br />Density Residential General Plan designation. <br /> <br />Regarding the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan modification, the merger of the Berlager <br />property with 27 Grey Eagle Court, there were two different designations on the property: <br />PUD-LDR and Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan/Open Space. Staff would like <br />clarification that the former Berlager property, which was within the Vineyard Avenue <br />Corridor Specific Plan, may be formally excluded from that area, and combined into the <br />Grey Eagle PUD Development Area. Staff believed this was more of a technical, rather <br />than a substantive modification. There would be no new lots created, which would not <br />create a precedent within the Vineyard Corridor Area. In addition, there would be no <br />effect on access, infrastructure, financing. Staff believed this was a unique case. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that the applicants were asked to prepare a tree report, which addressed <br />the heritage trees on the property. Some trees would be removed in conjunction with the <br />development ofthe new home. The design for the new home was not yet available, and <br />approximately ten trees would be removed, depending on the design and the amount of <br />__ grading required. Staff's strong preference, and a condition of approval, was to minimize <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />September II, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.