PC 091102 - Laserfiche WebLink

r In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Sullivan, Mr. Nicholson confirmed that the Park District would participate in the design of the park. They would condition the operating agreement relative to certain design parameters and concepts, recognizing that the detailed design considerations would be reviewed by City staff. Commissioner Roberts noted that with respect to noise, that the Vintage Hills area may be impacted and should be included in the noise studies. Ann Weiskamp, EBRPD Director, agreed with many of the Commissioners' comments. She believed that a fun design was possible without brilliant primary colors. She believed the park should keep the flavor of the park, with greens, browns, and real things. She noted that they were very concerned about neighbors' visibility impacts, and she believed the project would be aesthetically pleasing. She noted that the EBRPD was an important part of the City, and that they intended these recreational facilities to blend into the area. The Plarming Commission recessed for a break at 9: 12 p.m. Chairperson Maas reconvened the meeting at 9:23 p.m. d. PSP-3 and PUD-82-10-10M, Allen Roberts and Robert Grove General Plan conformity determination, Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan Amendment, and PUD development plan modification to reconfigure the lots located at 24, 27, and 28 Grey Eagle Court and the City of Pleasant on's Bonde II water tank property in order to relocate the lot and building envelope area at 24 Grey Eagle Court to generally south of the water tank site, to develop general design criteria for the new lot, and to expand the building envelope area for 28 Grey Eagle Court. Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR/OS (Plarmed Unit Development - Low Density Residential/Open Space) district and the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan. The Plarming Commission will also consider the negative declaration prepared for the project. ;---- Commissioner Kameny excused himself from this item. Mr. Iserson summarized this staff report, and noted that there had been previous, controversial plans for the development at 24 Grey Eagle Court, the most recent of which were denied by the Plarming Commission. Since that time, the property owner, Allen Roberts, and his neighbor, Robert Grove, had worked together to develop a new plan which seemed to have resolved most or all of the previous issues. The current plan involved a number of separate actions that the City needed to take to bring the proposal about. Mr. Iserson noted that the ultimate proposal was to merge 24 Grey Eagle Court with 28 Grey Eagle Court. The southeastem portion of 28 Grey Eagle Court would be combined with the southern portion of the City's water tank property, and the southem portion of27 __ Grey Eagle Court to produce a new 24 Grey Eagle Court site. The northern portion of the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES September 11, 2002 Page 15