Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Carole Varela, Mohr Avenue, noted that one of the important items in the "Minority Report" was <br />/'*'" that Mohr Avenue would not be widened. She asked that the six-foot parkway, seven-foot <br />sidewalk, plus additional planting area that abuts the wall be continued along the Jennaro <br />property, with trees planted to match the trees along the parkway and uniform landscaping. She <br />stated that she does not want parking on the other side of the street or the street widened. She <br />asked that one of the digital meters to monitor traffic speed be placed in the eastbound direction <br />between Kamp and Nursery, on the north side ofthe street across from the Jennaro property. <br /> <br />Sherry Dennis, 3768 Nichole Avenue, advised that she worked on the Housing Commission in <br />1992 during the development of the General Plan and worked five years ago with Ponderosa on <br />its proposal. She stated that Ponderosa has done a 120% better job this time and she supports <br />approval of the project. <br /> <br />Gevorg Nahapetian, 1423 Maple Leaf Court, voiced support for the proposed plan. He advised <br />that he is pleased with the cul-de-sac and that there will not be through traffic. He commented <br />that he doesn't feel the Planning Commission needs to be concerned with what the property <br />owners will do with the existing back yard fence when the new fence is constructed. <br /> <br />Rob Dondero, 1747 Nursery, advised that he opposed the original plan, but feels that Ponderosa <br />has addressed all of the issues that have been raised. He commented that Ponderosa has gone out <br />of its way to built trust that they will be providing a good plan. He noted that he likes the court <br />street design and feels the plan is a good extension of the existing neighborhood. He noted that <br />he feels the use of the school site for senior housing is perfectly suitable. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Ms. Hardy addressed the draft conditions of approval, noting that the applicant is, essentially, in <br />agreement with the conditions, but there are 15 or 16 conditions that she would like to discuss. <br />She cited and commented on the following conditions: <br /> <br />Condition 4.a.2. and 4.a.3. <br />Agrees generally with staff's recommendation, but would like the opportunity to work with staff <br />to refine that design. <br /> <br />Condition 4.a.4. and 4.b.4. <br />Believes the appropriate location for a pedestrian walkway to the Iron Horse Trail is at the <br />location they have proposed, because it will provide an open feeling, additional security and <br />safety, and will be more convenient for those who wish to access the trail from Busch and <br />Valley. Ms. Hardy noted that in discussions with the Fire Marshal, he has indicated that he is not <br />in support of direct EVA to the Iron Horse Trail, but prefers that the EVA traverse the parking <br />lot of the church. <br /> <br />Condition 5 <br />Suggests that no fewer than 20% of each plan type be used on the 9,000-square-foot lots, to <br />allow Ponderosa the flexibility to provide the mix. <br /> <br />Condition 6.b.1. <br />Would like the opportunity to work with staff on a potential redesign of the "Garage 2" element. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />July 24, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />