Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />ensuring that any subsequent developer agreed to those conditions as well. He believed <br />that it was important to ensure that the vineyards were planted in a timely manner, and <br />would be happy with any condition that would accomplish that goal. <br /> <br />A discussion of the escrow account and performance bond ensued. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin understood Greenbriar's reluctance to return to build the last home, <br />which would be costly and time-consuming. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan believed that Wente should be consulted during the process. <br /> <br />A discussion of the future ofthe 60KV line and the telephone line ensued. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan suggested leaving the utilities as they were until that issue was <br />resolved. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas inquired Commissioner Sullivan's position on the financing for the <br />utility infrastructure, Commissioner Sullivan would support going back to the other <br />vineyard developers. Chairperson Maas noted that they were in agreement. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan would like the developer to investigate the use of composite <br />fencing. He agreed with Steve Brozosky's statement about installing a buffer between <br />the vineyards and the oak trees. <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny thanked the developer for working with the Commission, and <br />added that he liked the architecture. He did not have a problem with the grading plan, <br />particularly Alternative "A." <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny noted that with regards to Condition 15, he would be amenable to <br />collecting a cash bond or a performance bond, providing it was satisfactory to staff. He <br />would prefer to leave the telephone pole as is, unless the developer could return with the <br />concurrence of the other developers to share the expense for the relocation. He added that <br />he supported the installation of the wood fencing. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin stated that he was in general support of the project. He liked the <br />architecture and the vineyard, and believed the development would be an asset to the <br />community. He inquired whether the project would be affected ifPG&E buried the <br />230KV line. Mr. Swift replied that there would be at least one vault located along the trail <br />on the Heinz property, and that the City would have to acquire the right of way. He added <br />that the slope was incompatible with a flat vault. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin believed that the sales office of the development should contain an <br />expanded list of disclosures for potential buyers, including the airport and the agricultural <br />activities. <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />July 10, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 17 <br />