PC 062602 - Laserfiche WebLink

r Commissioner Sullivan advised that the minutes did not accurately reflect some of his statements. He would like to consider the minutes during the next Planning Commission meeting in order to more thoroughly examine them. 3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA There were none. 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Commissioner Sullivan requested that Item 6.f. be heard after Item 6.a. 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION Jerry Iserson advised that Item 6-e would be continued to the meeting of June 26, 2002. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS a. Work Study Session for PUD-18/PGPA-4/PGM-6, Ponderosa Homes Application to construct a 1 92-lot single-family residential subdivision, a l72-unit senior apartment project, and a 5.79-acre church facility; and to designate an approximately 20-acre public school facility site on the approximately 92-acre property, commonly referred to as the Busch Property, located at the eastern terminus of Mohr Avenue. r- Mr. Iserson presented the staff report, and noted that the series of workshops were being held in order to guide the development process on the site. He described the proposal, and advised that the Housing Commission approved the affordable housing agreement associated with the project on June 20. The Commission recommended a fee waiver on the lower income units and deferred waiving the park dedication fee to the Planning Commission. The Housing Commission recommended a mix of senior units of one-and two bedroom units. Commissioner Arkin inquired how the five-year option for the school was reached and what would happen if the school did not execute its option. Mr. Iserson replied that if the five-year option was not executed, he believed that Ponderosa would like to propose additional housing for the property. He added that the five-year option was part of the agreement that they reached, and was estimated to be the amount oftime the school needed to make a determination. In response to Commissioner Arkin's question whether the City was involved in that agreement, Assistant City Attorney Larissa Seto replied that the City may want to r- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 26, 2002 Page 2