Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r- Resolution No. PC-2002-23 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />b. To consider whether the sale of the Alameda County Transportation Corridor from <br />Bernal Avenue to Stanley Boulevard (the former Southern Pacific Railroad ril!:ht-of- <br />way) by Alameda County is in conformance with Pleasanton's General Plan. <br /> <br />Jerry Iserson presented the staff report. He noted that the County is going through a legal <br />exercise as required by State law to sell a portion of the Alameda County Transportation <br />Corridor located in the Downtown area, and the City must determine if the sale of the property is <br />in conformance with the Pleasanton General Plan. Mr. Iserson responded to questions from the <br />Commissioners regarding potential uses for this property and conformance with the City's <br />General Plan. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />Brent Wilcox, 3988 Stanley Blvd., stated that he is representing MaryLou Wilcox. He noted that <br />it has always been a pleasure working with the City of Pleasant on and his preference would be to <br />not have to work with the County or East Bay Parks. He noted that how the trail is constructed <br />could affect the residential use of his mother's property, and, therefore, he would look forward to <br />working with Mike Fulford and Jerry Iserson, and other City staff members on the trail. <br /> <br />He expressed his appreciation to the members of the Planning Commission for their work. <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts moved to adopt the staff recommendation finding that the Alameda <br />County's intended sale of the Alameda County Transportation Corridor (Road Fund <br />Property) would not be consistent with Pleasanton's General Plan if sold to a buyer for the <br />purpose of any use other than a transportation-related use, but that it would be consistent <br />with the General Plan if it is sold to a buyer using it for transportation-related purposes. <br />Commissioner Kameny seconded the motion. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />A YES: Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Maas, Roberts, and Sullivan <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2002-24 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />7. MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, staff provided information regarding the lot <br />line adjustment which was approved for the Castlewood Heights project. <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />April 9, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 15 <br />