Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r parking situation have been provided to the Planning Commission this evening. She commented <br />on the issues related to parking, noting that the applicant would be required to have an in-lieu <br />parking agreement approved by the City Council for three spaces. She noted that staff has <br />included a requirement that this property owner provide reciprocal parking and access easements <br />and agreements with the surrounding properties as those properties come in for City approval. <br />She further noted that it is her understanding that the applicant is opposed to the requirement. <br /> <br />Ms. Kline stated that staff has spoken to the property owner about incorporating green building <br />measures and they have indicated that it is their intention to comply with their best effort. Ms. <br />Kline noted that staff did not require a scorecard on the proposed building. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Kline noted that 252 Spring Street is <br />currently a residence. She further noted that the owner of this property has contacted staff and <br />they are interested in converting this residence to office. Ms. Kline advised that Terry O'Hara <br />from the Building Department is present this evening to answer any questions and provide <br />information about the conversion process. <br /> <br />Mr. O'Hara provided clarification in response to inquiries from Commissioner Sullivan <br />regarding the appraisals that have been provided, noting that these reflect the assessed value, not <br />the market value. Mr. O'Hara also noted that the 50% figure used to determine whether it would <br />be appropriate to demolish the residence is a number determined by the Building Official. <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />Commissioner Harvey asked where clients of the new business would be expected to park. Ms. <br />Kline noted that there is very limited parking on Spring Street and Railroad A venue, and that <br />parking may extend to the adjoining streets in the Downtown. She advised that staff is in the <br />process of developing City lots and they feel that what would ultimately work in the long term is <br />to have employees park in future City parking lots that may be further from their work place, but <br />would leave the on-site parking for customers. <br /> <br />Chairperson Maas noted that the Valley Humane Center lot appears to not have many cars in it. <br />Ms. Kline stated that she understands that the while staff may like to have the lot for parking, the <br />property owner has other plans for the site. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, Mr. O'Hara provided clarification regarding <br />the estimate of the cost per square foot to replace the structure. Commissioner Arkin stated that <br />just by changing the depreciation factor the final outcome of the appraisal could be affected. Mr. <br />O'Hara advised that he and George Thomas visited the site and noticed defects in the building <br />that are not even mentioned in the appraisal. He reported that 216 Spring Street had the same <br />situation and what started as a remodeling of that building, ended up with the owner tearing the <br />building down because of all of the damage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Arkin asked if buildings are properly maintained does it result in this same <br />situation. He added that he personally does not mind having buildings rebuilt, as he thinks <br />something like this will look nicer, however, he knows that a lot of people in the community <br />want to maintain the old buildings. He stated that it appears that we are encouraging people to <br />r allow the building to fall into a state of disrepair so the City will allow them to tear the building <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />March 13, 2002 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br />