Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r-- applicants today regarding the requirement of the traffic signal at the corner of Bernal, Vineyard, <br />and Tawny. She noted that the applicant is not opposed to installing the signal with <br />reimbursement coming from local traffic fees for this project and future projects on the <br />properties in the Stanley Business Park owned by this property owner. Ms. Maier advised that <br />staff is recommending approval ofthe project subject to the conditions in Exhibit "B." <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Maier advised that the traffic signal <br />is not currently funded in the Capital Improvement Program. Ms. Seto reported that this traffic <br />signal was listed as one ofthe many traffic improvements needed when the City reviewed and <br />adopted the local traffic fee in 1998. She noted that this project has not reached the top of the <br />City Council's priority list to receive funding. She further noted that the property owner has <br />agreed to construct the signal and they will not have to pay the $50,000 in traffic fees due on this <br />project. She advised that the excess cost ofthe traffic signal installation incurred by the property <br />owner would be paid to them through a credit process provided by the ordinance as they build <br />out other projects on the property that they own in the Stanley Business Park. Commissioner <br />Harvey inquired as to whether this same condition would apply to a property owner who owned <br />only one parcel. Ms. Seto responded that it would still be applied, and under the provisions of <br />the ordinance, that owner would be reimbursed as local traffic fees are collected. She noted that <br />this applicant is being treated more favorably, because he can apply this credit to other <br />development, whereas other developers with a stand-alone parcel can only collect the <br />reimbursement as the City builds out, and it would take longer to get their money back. <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Maier presented a copy of the <br />striping plan for Del Valle Parkway, noting that a four-foot bike lane and 12-foot double turn <br />lane in the middle of the street are being added. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan noted that the letter from the architect regarding green building measures <br />indicates that a lot of the items "may" or "can" be done. He stated that there is no commitment <br />on most of the measures. Ms. Maier noted that she thinks the intent is that where it says "can" <br />in order to meet the requirement for the credit, he can and will do those things. She suggested <br />that the applicant respond to this item. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan commented that the letter states that an item related to renewable energy <br />is not feasible due to cost. He questioned how far the applicant explored whether it would be <br />feasible or not. Ms. Maier suggested that the applicant response to that inquiry. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Chairperson Maas, Ms. Seto advised that she does not believe the <br />traffic fee credit is interest bearing, but she would explore that further. She noted that the <br />applicant is agreeable to the credit. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />John Corley, 699 Peters Avenue, represented the property owner, providing background on the <br />development of the Stanley Business Park and the proposed building site. He noted that this is <br />the site ofthe former Remillard brick factory. Mr. Corley advised that the property owner <br />provided the land and constructed the Bernal Avenue extension to Stan1eyNalley, and the <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />March 13,2002 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />