Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r receive the same type of public attention they would receive if they went on to the City Council; <br />and, therefore, these houses may disappear without the community being aware of the situation. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Ms. Kline advised that staff is working on <br />the issue ofMr. Chestnut's fence. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts commented that when three of the Commissioners toured the Centex <br />Home's 21st Century House, she heard that if the City requires the construction of homes to <br />surpass the State Uniform Building Code the City must prove that it is different. Ms. Seto <br />advised that this is an issue that has been raised by representatives of the Home Builders' <br />Association. Ms. Seto provided additional clarification, stating that in reading the law, she does <br />not see a conflict, and she will be reviewing some language that is being prepared by the <br />Alameda County Waste Management Authority's legal counsel. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan commented that three of the Commissioners visited the Centex house in <br />Livermore. He reported that Centex is attempting to build a net-zero energy house. He further <br />commented that the costs to do the things to achieve the net-zero energy for this home was about <br />$20,000 to $30,000 more than not doing these things. Commissioner Roberts noted that the <br />energy usage and efficiency of this house will be monitored by U.C. Davis. Commissioner <br />Sullivan advised that he hopes when Centex constructs homes in Pleasanton that they will bring <br />some ofthis knowledge to these homes. <br /> <br />r-'- <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas stated that she wants to be sure that the scale of the project is considered in <br />the preparation of the Green Building Ordinance. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br /> <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />Discussion of the April 10, 2002 Planning Commission meeting date. <br />Chairperson Maas noted that the Planning Commission has been invited to attend a <br />roundtable discussion hosted by the City of San Ramon on Apri11 0, which is the same <br />date as the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. The Commission agreed <br />to reschedule its meeting to April 9. It was agreed that Chairperson Maas and Vice <br />Chairperson Kameny would make a brief presentation on some of the issues that are <br />being addressed in Pleasanton. <br /> <br />--- <br /> <br />Commissioner Sullivan reported that he understands the W. Las Positas Interchange <br />Community Advisory Committee recommendation report and minority report have been <br />completed. He asked about the process for review ofthese documents by the Planning <br />Commission. Ms. Kline advised that the document will be provided for review prior to a <br />presentation being made to the Planning Commission. She noted that it is likely that this <br />will be scheduled for the April 9 meeting, but may not be heard until April 24, as staff is <br />also scheduling the new 2001 Baseline Traffic Report for review. Ms. Kline confirmed <br />that after the Planning Commission comments on the W. Las Positas report it will go on <br />to the City Council. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />March 13,2002 <br /> <br />Page 14 <br />