PC 021302 - Laserfiche WebLink

of the Vineyard Corridor Specific Plan, the PUD Development Plan, and the Shared "....... Infrastructure Financing programs. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, Ms. Kline provided clarification concerning provisions of the financing plan with regard to buildable lots versus the splitting of lots. Commissioner Arkin noted that it sounds like the division of the property into parcels should trigger the implementation of the financing plan. Ms. Kline stated that it is staff s interpretation that the financing plan links the payment of specific plan fees to the creation of buildable lots. Discussion ensued regarding the interpretation of the financing program language. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Sullivan, Ms. Kline confirmed that currently the Berlogars have one lot with two land use designations. She also confirmed that it is staff s interpretation that fees for all of the lots on the Berlogar property (including the hillside residential property) would become due with the completion of Cent ex's final map. Ms. Kline noted that staff would support a recommendation to modify the "Shared Infrastructure Financing Program" as it pertains to the Chrisman, Berlogar, and Goodwin parcels, so that the first subdivision of a new hillside residential lot would trigger payment of all hillside residential "shares," but that the subdivision of the low-density residential lots would only trigger payment of low-density lot "shares." She discussed staffs reasons for supporting such a recommendation. Discussion ensued regarding the potential impacts of this modification on the installation of infrastructure and the reimbursement to the funding developers that would be required by individual lot owners who develop their lots after the area infrastructure has been built. f Commissioner Sullivan requested additional information regarding the requirements for the extension of City utilities. Ms. Kline advised that once the improvements are installed for the Centex development, the Berlogars' residence would need to be connected to the City's utility systems. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED As the appellant, Commissioner Sullivan, stated that he had wanted to get clarification on the concerns that he brought forward and he believes he now understands those issues. He advised that he had concerns about the precedent-setting nature of the parcel map approval and that the funds needed for the infrastructure would not be available. He stated that he also wanted to be certain that this action would not preclude the requirement for City water hook-up. Steve Brozosky, 1700 Vineyard A venue, stated that he is confused with the information provided in the staff report and staff's comments this evening. Staff provided clarification on the payment of fees and City utility requirements. Mr. Brozosky advised that he has no problem with the parcel split, but he wants to be sure that there is compliance with everything in the Specific Plan. He noted that there are seven parcels in the area that have multiple designations, and there may be more implications than realized with the splitting of the designations. He stated that he would not be opposed with a change in the Financing Plan, but it should be open to the public hearing process as to how this would be done. He questioned who would be responsible for the payment of infrastructure fees under various scenarios. Ms. Seto advised that if there is a proposal to "....... PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 13,2002 Page 4