My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 082201
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
PC 082201
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:40:13 PM
Creation date
4/15/2003 6:55:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/22/2001
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 082201
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />,,-- <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Planter boxes <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny noted that he has no problem with leaving in the planter boxes. This was <br />the consensus of the Commission. <br /> <br />6. Column expression <br /> <br />The Planning Commission supported alternative C. Mr. Graeser advised that they are in <br />agreement with recessing the windows. <br /> <br />Mr. Cannon suggested that the second floor arch windows need more work. He noted that the <br />area above the small windows should be of a material that matches the frames of the windows, <br />rather than a contrasting material. Mr. Cannon noted that he would like to see the brick all one <br />color. Mr. Graeser advised that they would like to see the horizontal band a different color. <br />Commissioner Kameny stated that he likes the band as shown in the rendering. Commissioner <br />Roberts noted that this is not a major issue. Commissioner Harvey stated that the colors are not <br />really evident in the rendering. He noted that there is a lot of geometric detail in the design and <br />he would like the colors to be simpler. Chairperson Sullivan asked for two large color <br />renderings: one depicting the proposed design, and one depicting the one-color brick design. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts advised that with regard to the questions in staffs memo, she agrees that <br />the building addresses the previous concerns raised by the Commission. She further advised that <br />she feels the remainder of the questions were addressed in the discussion. <br /> <br />5.b. Workshop to review a proposal to construct a wireless communications facility <br />consisting of an artificial tree, panel antennas, global positioning satellite (GPS), and <br />related equipment located at 7315 Johnson Drive. Zoning for the property is <br />Planned Unit Development - General and Limited Industrial District. <br /> <br />Commissioner Harvey advised that he would excuse himself from the discussion of this item <br />because of a potential conflict of interest. <br /> <br />Ms. Eisenwinter presented the revised proposal, commenting on the modifications to the height <br />of the pole, the placement of the brackets and panel antennas, and the design of the tree pole. <br />She noted that staff feels the revised proposal is more realistic in appearance and meets the <br />"stealth requirements" of the Pleasanton Municipal Code. She advised that staff does not feel the <br />photo simulations match the plans and recommends the photo simulations be revised in <br />accordance with the plans. She also advised that staff is recommending that the antennas be <br />painted "Dark Earth," and provided a sample of this color for the Commission's review. Ms. <br />Eisenwinter reported that the Cingular antennas are no longer proposed on the tree pole and that <br />they will be submitting a proposal for a stealth flagpole facility at the front of the Lock It Up <br />Storage site. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan opened the work session to hear comments from the applicant. <br /> <br />,-. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />August 22,2001 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.