PC 062701 - Laserfiche WebLink

because it will be consistent, and this data has not been consistent. She commented that this r requirement should not effect the removal of the "Berlogar line." Vice Chairperson Maas and Commissioner Arkin indicated their concurrence with the two-year requirement. Commissioner Arkin moved to accept staff's recommendation for the three modified mitigation measures as outlined in the staff report. Commissioner Roberts seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners Arkin, Harvey, Maas, and Roberts None Commissioners Kameny and Sullivan None Resolution No. PC-200l-33 was entered and adopted as motioned. Commissioner Arkin noted that he appreciates how staff handled the Commission's concerns regarding this matter. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. PAP-19 (PSDR-76. Mardel L.L.C.) Appellant: Lynn Sorensen Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of two monument signs which state "Lemoine Ranch Estates" located at 4456 Foothill Road. Zoning for the property is PUD-RDR/LDR/ A (Planned Unit Development - Rural Density Residential/Low Density Residential/Agriculture District. r Marion Pavan presented the staff report, providing background on the application and information regarding the location and design of the signs. He noted that because of concerns voiced by Ms. Sorensen, a hearing was held by the Zoning Administrator, at which time the signs were approved. Ms. Sorensen appealed this approval. Mr. Pavan advised that stafffeels the proposed signs compare favorably with the existing entrance signs along Foothill Road. He referred to the personal agreements referenced in the staff report, noting that the City does not enforce personal agreements. Mr. Pavan advised that staff feels the proposed signs are appropriate and attractive, and recommends that the Planning Commission deny the appeal, thereby approving the signs subject to the conditions of the staff report. Staff provided clarification in response to Commissioner Robert's inquiry as to where the private road begins. In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, Mr. Pavan advised that the Planning Commission has the latitude to change the location and design of the signs, but would need to state reasons for any modifications. Ms. Seto reported that the City tries not to get involved in issues related to private agreements, but the Planning Commission has wide latitude with regard r- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 27, 2001 Page 3