Laserfiche WebLink
<br />suggesting that if the Commission is willing to allow the buildings to be finalled and occupied <br />r-. that the installation timeframe requirement be reduced to three months and a letter of credit be <br />provided by Panattoni for the full cost of the systems. She stated that staff is recommending that <br />the intent of the "Green Power Park" be maintained and that a 75 Kwh system, which is <br />substantially similar to the originally-approved 100 Kwh system, be required. She also advised <br />that staff would prefer that the installation be completed prior to the final occupancy of the <br />building, but if the Commission does not agree, the required installation be completed in a <br />shorter time frame than six months, and that some type of cash instrument be implemented to <br />guarantee installation. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the requirement for a cash instrument versus the requirement for a <br />bond. It was noted that the costs associated with the installation of each of the 75 Kwh systems <br />would be approximately $375,000. There was also discussion about the costs to upgrade systems <br />to larger capacity systems. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, Ms. Kline clarified that five additional <br />buildings are being proposed for the Pleasanton Power Park. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT <br /> <br />r- <br /> <br />John Buckel of Panattoni Development, 201 N. Civic Drive #250, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, <br />represented the applicant. He stated that the applicant is disappointed that they have to come <br />back to the Commission to ask for a modification to the original proposal. He advised that it is <br />very difficult to obtain accurate and consistent information regarding pricing and rebates for <br />photovoltaic systems. He noted that originally the proposal was offered to them as a feature to <br />their buildings at, essentially, no cost to them. He further noted that Detroit Edison was to have <br />purchased the panels and Panattoni would have only had to lease roof-top space to them and <br />agree to have the building tenants or buyers commit to purchasing power from Detroit Edison at <br />or below the open-market cost. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Kameny, Mr. Buckel advised that Panattoni has a <br />long-term ground lease with the Best family, and they have the option to purchase the ground <br />upon the sale of the buildings to other parties. Mr. Buckel advised that Mr. Best worked with <br />Detroit Edison to secure grant funds for the original proposal. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Arkin, Mr. Buckel advised the pay-back on the <br />systems would be about 9-1/2 to II years based on P.G.&E.'s current rates, and the warranty on <br />the systems is about 25 years. <br /> <br />Mr. Buckel noted that they have already invested over $100,000 in the project to make the <br />buildings ready for the systems. He noted that these are shell buildings, but they have taken into <br />account additional energy measures such as low-E reflective glass, increased wall panel <br />thickness, and tying the buildings together in order to provide for shared-power. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />May 23, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 13 <br />