PC 050901 - Laserfiche WebLink

-- Commissioner Maas stated that she is not in favor of placing the fence at the crest of the hill. Commissioner Harvey stated that he would not be in favor of placing the fence in this location as this would create another line on the ridge and the "J-ditch" already creates a line along the ridge. He recommended that the fence run along the "J-ditch." The Planning Commission did not reach consensus on this item. Chairperson Sullivan suggested that a condition be added that no accessory structures, terraces, or excavation on the slope area behind Lots I -5. Commissioner Maas stated that she would like to leave the homeowner the right to develop their property. There was consensus that only vegetation would be allowed on the slope. Sidewalks. Commissioner Arkin stated that sidewalks are needed on one side of the street and he wants to see rolled curbs and a monolithic sidewalk as in his neighborhood. The Commission concurred. It was noted that this street could be used by cut-through traffic taking students to and from the school. Landscaping on the northeast side of Lot 6. Commissioner Arkin stated that he would like to see additional trees in this area to shield Mr. Brozosky's property. Mr. Swift noted that because of the height of Mr. Brozosky's house this landscaping will not shield it. The Commission concurred with adding additional trees, with the size of the those trees to be determined by the Planning staff. r- Shared-well. Commissioner Maas advised that she stated at the last meeting that she did not want to comment on the well, however she would support the Commissioner Arkin's recommendation that the Chrismans cease use of the well if the capacity falls below a certain level. Mr. Swift suggested that technical language regarding performance standards be brought back at the time of the tentative map. Chairperson Sullivan advised that he is hesitant to get involved in this matter as it is a legal issue, and not a planning issue. He noted that he understands Mr. Brozosky's risk with regard to the well. There was agreement that the staff would explore some mechanism to measure when the level of the well falls below a certain capacity, and that this mechanism would be brought back to the Planning Commission with the tentative map. Relocation of Lot 6. The Planning Commission discussed the possible relocation of Lot 6. There was no support for this revision. Chairperson Sullivan noted that staff had recommended that Condition #94 be modified to allow 2:1 slopes between lots. The Commission agreed. Chairperson Sullivan suggested that Condition #2.c.(3) be modified to clarify the maximum number of horses and/or cattle allowed. The Commission agreed. r- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 9, 2001 Page 6