PC 032801 - Laserfiche WebLink

opportunity to review the project in such a way that he would be comfortable taking action on r- the project this evening. He suggested continuing the item completely or hearing the item, with input from the public and the applicant, and comments from the Commission, with action deferred to the next meeting. Commissioner Maas stated that she is ready to take action this evening, but she understands Chairperson Sullivan's concerns. She suggested hearing from the public, but noted the applicant may want to delay comments in that they have had a short time to review the staff report. Commissioner Arkin advised that he did not receive the staff report until 10:00 p.m. last night, because he attended the City Council workshop, and he has not had an opportunity to review the materials. Commissioner Arkin advised that by the rules of the Commission he is continuing the item for two weeks and suggested that members of the public wishing to address this item be allowed to so under "meeting open to the public." Trece Herder, representing Centex Homes, advised that they would be in agreement with continuing the item. The Planning Commission agreed to continue Item 6.c., Centex Homes, to the April II, 2001 meeting. 3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA There were none. r 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Item 6.d., PUD-3, Clay and Schelly Frades, was continued to the April II, 2001 meeting. 5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION There were none. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Review of Recommendations for Capital Improvement Program Proiects for 2001- 2006 Steven Bocian provided background on the Capital Improvement Program Project process, noting that the Planning Commission is being asked to review a list of projects that are currently being considered for funding. He advised that the projects which stafffeels have the highest priority are so noted on the list. He requested that the Planning Commission provide input regarding staff s recommended "highest priority" items, as well as any other project on the list, or not on the list, that the Commission feels should be ranked as a high priority. He asked that the Planning Commission look at the list not only as a Commissioner, but also as a community member. He requested that the Commission review staffs recommendation, advise whether they r- March 28, 2001 Page 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES