CCMIN090710 - Laserfiche WebLink

Vice Mayor Thorne questioned if those running would need to recuse themselves, and Mr. Lowell said there is a mechanism under State law that if a decision has to be made, straws can be drawn and those who have a conflict would be put back into the ring to vote. At issue here is whether this is a decision that has to be made or it could be put off until after the election. Mayor Hosterman said the City has been subsidizing candidate statement payments for a number of years and questioned where this money comes from. She recalls making the decision thinking it made good economic sense to be more fiscally responsible. However, it is a tremendous difference in what was paid previously. Mr. Fialho said the City went from almost a full subsidy to a revenue neutral stance with this action. But, as the City Attorney stated, the issue can be addressed after the election and there would be no conflict of interest. The issue of how much would be subsidized moving forward could be taken up at that time. Councilmember Cook- Kallio noted that in other cities, candidates are provided an option to pay the entire amount, and she suggested additional options be considered. Councilmember Sullivan believed it was almost like a barrier and poll tax, suggested going back to having a subsidized situation, and for discussion to be held. Mr. Fialho suggested agendizing the matter after the election. Councilmember Sullivan questioned whether it could be retroactive to these candidates, and Mr. Lowell said he thinks it is possible. If he finds in the next couple of days that there is the ability for the matter to be heard sooner, perhaps the City Manager could agendize it sooner. Councilmember McGovern questioned if any cities have an endowment for those running who cannot afford fees. Unaware if any cities offer endowment, Ms. Diaz stated the deposit for the optional statements is estimated by the County ROV based on the number of registered voters. She noted candidates are given information concerning indigency and if eligible their statement can be printed without advancing the deposit. She offered that could formulate a policy guideline for Council review to address future elections. Councilmember Sullivan felt the $1100 was significant if not receiving large amounts from campaign contributors. He suggested revisiting the matter. Mayor Hosterman supported review of the matter. COUNCIL REPORTS: None There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:18 p.m., with a tribute to our nation's men and women serving in the military. We wish to honor the memories of those who have died in past wars in defense of our country including those who have died in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. City Council Minutes Respectfully submitted, Karep Diaz City Jerk - Page 15 of 15 September 7, 2010