My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13 ATTACHMENT 07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
101910
>
13 ATTACHMENT 07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2010 11:31:30 AM
Creation date
10/14/2010 11:31:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13 ATTACHMENTS 07
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Figure 9: Typical Valley Avenue Traffic Circle. <br /> Bernal Avenue was widened along the project's frontage to accommodate City traffic and <br /> Gateway traffic — one Bernal Avenue driveway entrance was approved as a right -turn <br /> (only) entrance lane and a right turn (only) merge lane defined by a large, landscaped <br /> "pork chop" island. Construction of the "pork chop" island was deferred to the construction <br /> of the original Pleasanton Gateway office development. The Bernal Avenue street <br /> frontage of the Gateway property includes a meandering sidewalk and sycamore trees. <br /> I11. PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSIONS <br /> The Planning Commission conducted two work sessions on the Pleasanton Gateway <br /> proposal on May 28, 2008 and then on October 14, 2009. Minutes of the meetings are <br /> attached (Exhibit N). At both work sessions, the Planning Commission expressed its <br /> support of the proposed project and commented favorably on the overall design quality of <br /> the site plan and building architecture. <br /> The following summary of the Planning Commission's comments from the work sessions <br /> does not include the Commission's comments on the service station now deleted from the <br /> proposed project: <br /> • The Planning Commission generally agreed that the proposal implemented the <br /> applicable goals and policies of the Bernal Specific Plan and fit in well with the area. <br /> Its location warrants an eye- catching, heavily landscaped area at an entry point into <br /> Pleasanton. Additionally, the project should create a community focal point and <br /> gathering place. <br /> Pleasanton Gateway Page 8 of 35 August 25, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.