My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13 ATTACHMENT 03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
101910
>
13 ATTACHMENT 03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2010 11:24:59 AM
Creation date
10/14/2010 11:24:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/19/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13 ATTACHMENTS 03
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pleasanton Gateway- Environmental Checklist <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Noise <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 1 X I L_I <br /> excess of standards established in the local general <br /> plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of <br /> other agencies? <br /> b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive Li 1 X <br /> ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? <br /> c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise C_ I x I Lā <br /> levels in the project vicinity above levels existing <br /> without the project? <br /> d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in P1 LXJ L <br /> ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels <br /> existing without the project? <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, L X <br /> where such a plan has not been adopted, within two <br /> miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the <br /> project expose people residing or working in the <br /> project area to excessive noise levels? <br /> f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, L _ <br /> would the project expose people residing or working in <br /> the project area to excessive noise levels? <br /> Discussion <br /> a -b) The ambient noise level for the site varies from 70 dBA Ld at the edge -of- <br /> pavement on Valley Avenue to 80 dEtA L at the site's boundary line with the 1- <br /> 680. This ambient noise level is considered to be "Conditionally Acceptable" for <br /> "Office Buildings, Business Commercial, and Professional" land uses ā 70 dBA Ld <br /> to 80 dBA L ā by the 2005 ā 2025 Pleasanton General Plan'. Standard <br /> commercial /office building construction can achieve a 15 dB to 20 dB reduction in <br /> interior noise levels, thereby achieving the 60 dBA Ld interior noise standard of <br /> the Pleasanton General Plan'. Therefore, this would be a less than - significant- <br /> impact. <br /> c) The Bernal Property Specific Plan and Final EIR required the construction of <br /> commercial /office buildings on the Pleasanton Gateway property, at a minimum <br /> 19 -foot building height, to mitigate the noise impacts from the 1 -680 freeway to the <br /> residential developments on the east side of Valley Avenue. As stated in the <br /> Pleasanton General Plan, construction of an eight -foot tall noise barrier on the 1- <br /> 680 property line will move the 60 dBA Ld noise contour line to the approximate <br /> Page 42 of 52 Pleasanton Gateway Initial Study August 2, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.