Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton Climate Action Plan. CAP Format, Approach, and Content <br /> appendix of Recommended Changes to the Hayward General Plan. San Francisco mentions that it has existing <br /> policies in place to support reducing transportation- related greenhouse gas emissions, including those in the <br /> General Plan. San Leandro states that its General Plan includes policies and actions that guide long -range <br /> development decisions in the City to promote environmental sustainability for current and future generations. <br /> In terms of overall style and format, the CAP must provide sufficient technical detail while conveying concepts <br /> and pertinent information to a wide range of readers. In our review of Bay Area CAPs, we found that other cities <br /> have achieved varying levels of success in striking the proper balance. Those that are most successful combine <br /> clear, straightforward writing with informative tables and figures; and relegate technical information, such as <br /> assumptions, sources, and calculations of GHG reduction potential, to technical appendices. <br /> Of the CAPs reviewed, those for the City of San Carlos and the City of San Ramon best achieve this kind of <br /> balance. They both score highly in terms of content, including most if not all of the required elements of a <br /> "qualified CAP," and both are well - integrated with their city's General Plan, identifying General Plan policies <br /> that support CAP emission reduction strategics. They also score well in terms of overall document design and <br /> layout. Alongside San Carlos, the City of Albany CAP stands out for its clarity of presentation and in particular <br /> for its visual style. <br /> The San Carlos CAP does a good job of projecting emissions and presenting targets for 2020 and 2030, <br /> explaining GHG reduction scenarios, considering the impact of state policy initiatives, and quantifying the costs <br /> and emissions reduction potential of individual measures. The CAP relies heavily on ICLEI's Climate and Air <br /> Pollution Planning Assistant (CAPPA) tool to quantify the impacts of reduction measures, but it does not clearly <br /> present how the contributions of the State initiatives are quantified. State measures account for approximately <br /> 60% of the community -wide emission reductions needed for meeting the city's 2020 target. <br /> The CAP produced for Pleasanton's neighbor, the City of San Ramon, integrates well with that city's General <br /> Plan and claims to be a "qualified CAP" under BAAQMD guidelines. Strategies are primarily based upon the <br /> land use, transportation, and conservation policies that are part of the General Plan 2030, recent specific plans, <br /> and major development plans in the City. The CAP demonstrates that the city's General Plan policies and CAP <br /> strategies, in combination with state policy, would reduce emissions to 1990 levels, or 15% below its 2008 <br /> baseline. The CAP uses transparent methods to quantify the GHG reducing effects of state policy (primarily fuel <br /> efficiency, tailpipe standards, and building efficiency) and targets a minimum 15% reduction (from business as <br /> usual) for all new development projects in the City, presenting a scenario where it achieves (at minimum) a 15% <br /> overall reduction in emissions from its 2008 baseline. It relies substantially on the premise that the two largest <br /> sources over which the City has jurisdiction, mobile sources and new building construction, will see substantial <br /> emission reductions from state regulations on fuel efficiency in motor vehicles and energy efficiency in buildings. <br /> Overall, it projects that state measures will provide 92% of community -wide emission reductions needed for <br /> meeting the city's 2020 target. There is no official response yet from BAAQMD to indicate whether the methods <br /> used in San Ramon's CAP are consistent with their "qualified CAP" guidelines. <br /> Other stand -out CAPs in our review include the City of San Leandro CAP, for its cost - benefit analysis of GHG <br /> reduction strategies, and the City of Hayward CAP, for its detailed comparative evaluation and prioritization of <br /> strategies. We recommend drawing from the document design, organizational, and methodological approaches in <br /> the five CAPs mentioned here to guide development of the City of Pleasanton CAP. In terms of document <br /> appearance, we will use ESA's standard style guide for formatting text, tables, and graphics. We will use <br /> descriptive graphics and figures liberally to illustrate concepts and present quantitative information in an <br /> accessible manner. <br /> ESA intends to review the San Carlos and San Ramon CAPs in detail with BAAQMD, in particular the <br /> methodologies used to quantify state policy impacts, to determine how well they meet the intent and rigor of the <br /> BAAQMD guidelines and the expectations of the State Attorney General. <br /> 3 <br />