CCMIN082410SP - Laserfiche WebLink

Dolan said the measurement is not linear, but increases are perceptible at increments of 3 decibels. If the question is whether it is worth the effort to reduce noise levels from 61 to 60 decibels here, one could make the argument that the change would be imperceptible. Mr. Fialho referred to the table of noise levels contained within the General Plan, said 60 decibels is the threshold, 70 is comparable to a gas powered lawnmower at 30 meters, 80 -90 decibels is like a large truck passing within 15 meters, and 100 decibels is like a pile driver. Councilmember McGovern referred to the Specific Plan amendments as they pertain to flood control where it comments on the deferral of certificates of occupation until implementation of Livermore Flood Protection Improvements. She said it continues in stating that if Livermore has not succeeded in executing this, the cost sharing agreement requires that Alameda County Surplus Property Authority will construct the planned Livermore Flood Protection Improvements. Mr. Bocian said Livermore's plans are not clear at this time, but they are continuing to work on the project. Councilmember McGovern questioned and confirmed with Mr. Bocian that the issue would be resolved when CLC breaks ground. Mayor Hosterman opened the public hearing. Pat Cushman, representing the County of Alameda acknowledged the efforts of the community in bringing these issues to light and those of staff in bringing the proponents and opponents of the project together. He said tonight's discussion has been reasonable and fair, although he noted the development agreement calls for the opening of Stoneridge Drive when Jack London Boulevard opens and has nothing to do with the Regional Policy Agreement. He said the region wanted Stoneridge Drive built, the quid pro quo for that was the priority setting of SR -84, and both parties are concerned the other side will renege. He said he wants there to be no political misunderstanding regarding this issue in the future. This project deserves certainty and that is what the development agreement does. Aside from that, he voiced appreciation for the City's positive approach to the project and complimented neighbors. Ralph Kanz, Alameda Creek Alliance Conservation Director, said the Alliance is in full support of the project at this point. He said it has been a long and difficult process, but the result is a fair agreement that balances the needs of all parties. He complimented everyone involved in the final negotiations, particularly Troy Bourne and Matt Morrison. Mary Tantillo said this has been a long process and she looks forward to having CLC as place to retire. Brenda Harris thanked the Council for working so closely with the developer and other interests. She said she is very happy to see the project move forward and hoped it would do so quickly enough for her parents to take advantage of. John Harris said his grandparents intend to move into Stoneridge Creek, and he is excited to see this move forward and them to stay so close. Ted Tinges said he and his wife have lived in Pleasanton for nearly 15 years and they look forward to living in the Stoneridge Creek development. He said he has heard it may not be finished for 2 -3 years, at which point he will be 80 years old and perhaps not around to move in. He implored the Council and community to vote in approval of the project. Marge Johnson thanked everyone for the time and energy spent in reaching agreement on the project. As co -chair of the self- appointed Stoneridge Task Force, she said she would be remiss in not acknowledging the efforts of Barbara Hemphill. Special City Council Minutes Page 7 of 9 August 24, 2010