My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN082410SP
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
CCMIN082410SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2010 11:32:02 AM
Creation date
9/23/2010 11:32:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/24/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN082410SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
auto mall's business approach. Staff reviewed standards submitted by Councilmember Sullivan <br /> and he explained they are likely not very useful, as LEED guidelines provides standards for <br /> safety and comfort only. He noted the same standards even present some conflict with the <br /> parks in this project. Staff has included a broad condition that addresses energy efficiency in <br /> lighting, although it could likely benefit from some additional dialogue. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan asked that staff revisit these standards and take a particular look at <br /> other locations where this has been done and what measures were used. <br /> Councilmember Cook - Kallio said there are other communities dealing with this, as well, and <br /> believes there must be experimentation with some kind of model dealing with light pollution. Mr. <br /> Bocian said there are many examples of communities that have been less successful than <br /> Pleasanton in limiting the light, but perhaps some have done even better. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan referred to the upcoming Climate Action Plan and asked how the <br /> outcome of that might apply to this project, particularly since the development agreement <br /> contains language that may deal with subsequent regulations that might arise. Former City <br /> Attorney Michael Roush stated that if the Council decides to approve a development agreement <br /> for this project, it locks into place rules, regulations, and ordinances of the City that will apply to <br /> the project during the life of the agreement. This means that unless the development agreement <br /> provides or the project developer agrees otherwise, new policies or ordinances that might <br /> prevent the project or increase the cost of the project cannot be unilaterally imposed by the <br /> Council. He noted that development agreements often have a life of ten years, this project is <br /> likely to continue much longer than that, and the Council's opportunities to impose those <br /> regulations will occur. <br /> Councilmember Thorne said he understands the only leverage the City has to ensure that one <br /> of the regional partners does not violate the terms and conditions of the Policy Statement is to <br /> keep Stoneridge Drive closed. Mr. Fialho said it is only a statement and not a legal document. <br /> His reading of the agreement is that if anyone were to violate the Policy Statement, the City has <br /> the ability to reconsider its implementation of that Policy Statement, which means potential <br /> continued closure of Stoneridge Drive or other things contemplated in the document. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan clarified and confirmed with Mr. Fialho that no other jurisdiction has <br /> adopted the policy and the Council would be the first in doing so tonight. Mr. Fialho stated that <br /> each party has indicated that as soon as the City of Pleasanton approves the regional <br /> agreement, they will plan to agendize it within 60 days. <br /> Councilmember Thorne referred to the 1 -580 metering light proposed as mitigation to cut - <br /> through traffic and requested confirmation that there is no implication the lights will be in use <br /> outside of peak traffic hours. Mr. Tassano said the metering lights are programmed to operate <br /> 2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., although those times are adjustable either through Caltrans or the City. <br /> Councilmember Cook - Kallio questioned and confirmed with Mr. Fialho that the bicycle lanes <br /> through the closed portion of the Stoneridge Drive connection would be available immediately. <br /> Also, she confirmed that staff anticipates completing the sound attenuating asphalt and other <br /> mitigations prior to the completion of Stoneridge Drive. Regarding Snowdrop Circle and possible <br /> extension of the sound wall, she suggested it may be appropriate to wait until after installation of <br /> the sound attenuating asphalt to see if residents feel it necessary. She asked how much of that <br /> noise could be mitigated by landscaping. Mr. Dolan said it would require a certain density of <br /> material before any noise is reflected away from homes, which is not a likely option. She asked <br /> if decibel readings increase exponentially similar to the way earthquakes are measured. Mr. <br /> Special City Council Minutes Page 6 of 9 August 24, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.