PC 031401 - Laserfiche WebLink

staff is open to any proposal from the applicant. Commissioner Maas confirmed with the applicant that this can be resolved between staff and the applicant. ,,-- Ms. Herder advised that the applicant is willing to work with staff to prepare a pamphlet for homeowners regarding the uses allowed on their property (e.g., the ability to construct accessory structures). Geoffrey C. Etnire, 4900 Hopyard Road, advised that he represents RMC Pacific Materials (formerly RMC Lonestar). He advised that Wente's contract rights couldn't be broken by the property owner for ten years. He noted that agreement on the form of the contract has been reached. Mr. Steve Brozosky, 1700 Vineyard A venue, stated that he feels the proposal is a very good plan. He commented on the issues raised in his e-mail dated March 14,2001 related to: . the proximity of the day care site in relation to the existing 60 KV power line and the proposed KV lines. . on-site parking for employees and drop-off and pick-up of children at the day care site. . the need for landscaping on both sides of the loop road around the school. . driveway access for his property. . the responsibility for relocating mailboxes and/or newspaper tubes for current residences if neccesary . . signage for private streets and no parking areas. . the requirement that project homeowners shall maintain shrubs planted within the trail right- of-way. ,,-- Mr. Brozosky also expressed concern about whether there is sufficient parking for the school site. Arlene Utal, 712 Bancroft Road #119, Walnut Creek CA 94598, stated that she represents the day care site along with Centex. The advised that over the last two years extensive studies have been done in England and the United States and no related illnesses have been found associated with living under power lines. She stated that she does not see the difference between having homes or a day care center under the power lines. She advised that she is currently involved in four other day care centers and none of them have a concern with power lines. She commented that if the Planning Commission has a concern about this issue she cannot wait six months after the PUD is approved to come back and hear that there is a concern about the day care center under the power lines. She stated that she needs to hear for sure this evening that this issue will be put to rest or consideration needs to be given to finding another site for the day care center. Mr. Swift clarified that the approval for the day care would be a design review and conditional use permit approval. Chairperson Sullivan advised Ms. Utal that this is the PUC's environmentally superior route for the transmission line through this area. Ms. Utal commented that the Planning Commission should have the same concerns for the day care center as it has for the school. ,- PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 14,2001 Page 8