My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 022801
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
PC 022801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:36:26 PM
Creation date
3/27/2003 7:29:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/28/2001
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 022801
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;:^ <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan noted that he agrees with Commissioner Kameny's comments, and that he <br />will support the motion in the interest of trying to make the project work. He advised that, in <br />general, he does not like making these modifications, and the applicant should go into a project <br />with its eyes wide open. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br /> <br />AYES: <br />NOES: <br />ABSENT: <br />ABSTAIN: <br /> <br />Commissioners Arkin, Kameny, Roberts, and Sullivan <br />Commissioner Maas <br />None <br />None <br /> <br />Resolution No. PC-2001-09 was entered and adopted as motioned. <br /> <br />Commissioner Maas advised that she could not support the motion because she is opposed to <br />placing building requirements that would result in a financial strain on small businesses. <br /> <br />h. Work Session ree;ardine; Photovoltaics <br /> <br />Robin Eisenwinter presented the staff report. She noted that the City does have an opportunity to <br />join with other agencies and businesses to provide photovoltaics at a lower cost. She advised <br />that staff feels there is a three-fold purpose for this workshop. One is to listen to public comment <br />about photovoltaics. The second is to have the Planning Commission ask questions about <br />photovoltaics. She noted that she will research the answers to those questions for which she does <br />/~ not have the answers, and provide them at the next Planning Commission meeting. She advised <br />that the third purpose is to begin the discussion as to whether the City should encourage or <br />require photovoltaics (PV); how the City should process approvals for installation of <br />photovoltaic systems; and whether the City should consider purchasing systems in bulk, with or <br />without other agencies, and consider other types of financial incentives. She noted that a Green <br />Building workshop is scheduled for the March 14 Planning Commission meeting, and since <br />photovoltaics is a part of Green Building, this discussion could be continued over to that <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny stated that while he concurs with the use of photovoltaic systems, given <br />the variety of systems that are available, he doesn't see the City becoming involved in <br />purchasing and providing photovoltaics for resale. Ms. Eisenwinter advised that when SMUD <br />partners with other cities, SMUD purchases one standard panel in bulk, and provides it for resale. <br /> <br />Chairperson Sullivan advised that there are lots of different programs that the City could be <br />involved in other than just purchasing the systems in bulk. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts asked about the weight limit that is allowed on a roof, noting that these <br />issues need to be considered. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />?- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />February 28, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.