Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Item 6.b, Reconsideration of the Planning Commission Decision Recommending Approval of <br />PUD-88-16-2M, and Item 6.c., Review of the 2000-2001 Growth Management Report, were <br />continued to the March 14 meeting. Mr. Pavan requested that the agenda be reordered to hear <br />Item 6.h., Work Session regarding Photovoltaics, following Item 6.c. The Planning Commission <br />agreed. Mr. Pavan also noted that the reference on the agenda regarding the continuance of Item <br />6.e., Review of Recommendations for Capital Improvement Program Projects for 2001-2006, <br />was an error, and advised that it is the discretion of the Planning Commission as to whether it <br />wants to hear this item tonight. He noted that staff would be comfortable with deferring this item <br />to the meeting of March 14 or March 28. It was the consensus of the Planning Commission to <br />continue this item to the March 14 meeting. Mr. Pavan suggested that consideration be given to <br />holding the work session regarding Green Building Practices at 6:00 p.m. on March 14. It was <br />agreed that this matter would be discussed at the end of the meeting. <br /> <br />5. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />There were none. <br /> <br />6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />a. <br /> <br />PDR-81/PCUP-20, Pacific Bell <br />Application for conditional use permit and design review approvals to construct an <br />approximately 8,700-square-foot, one-story addition and related site improvements to the <br />existing Pacific Bell switching facility located at 120 Ray Street. The proposed addition <br />would be located on the southern (Spring Street) side of the existing building. Zoning for <br />the property is Central Commercial, Downtown Revitalization, Core Overlay District. <br /> <br />.-- <br /> <br />Mr. Pavan presented the staff report, providing an overview of the project. He advised that the <br />applicant is in concurrence with the conditions of approval. He further advised that the <br />elevations presented this evening do not reflect staff's recommended changes, but that these <br />changes will be made. He noted that the conditions of approval included in the staff report for <br />this hearing have been updated to include the condition stated in staff's memorandum of <br />February 14. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Pavan confirmed that the metal <br />storage shed will be removed. <br /> <br />PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED <br /> <br />COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT <br /> <br />Jeffrey Runels, 2600 Camino Ramon, Room 3E200P, San Ramon, represented the applicant. He <br />provided an overview of the functions of the building and the reason for the proposed addition. <br /> <br />.-- <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />February 28, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />