PC 012401 - Laserfiche WebLink

include P.G.&E.'s approval. He also requested that Condition #40 be revised to state that the ,r- . cash bond or security shall be forfeited if the trees are destroyed or substantially damaged "by the developer." In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Hirst advised that if contour grading is not done on the south side, a retaining wall would be constructed next to the parking lot and there would be a more level area along Diamond Court, and the trees would grow faster. Commissioner Arkin commented on the costs to install photo voltaic panels and the potential energy savings. Mr. Hirst advised that they would be willing to look at this option. The Commission recessed for a break at 8:45 p.m. Vice Chairperson Maas reconvened the meeting at 8:50 p.m. Commissioner Arkin stated that with regard to the comments regarding massing, having this site developed with six or seven homes would look worst than the massing of the office building. He advised that he feels it is a gorgeous building. He advised that he spoke with the applicant and they agreed to work with staff to determine how may photovoltaic panels they can install on the roof and he wants to see this included in the conditions. He stated that he feels lowering the grade will detract from the beauty of the building. ,r-. Commissioner Kameny stated that he is sympathetic to the residents and he appreciates the time the developers have taken to meet with the neighbors. He noted that the project conforms with the General Plan and the North Sycamore Specific Plan. He advised that he is concerned that lowering the building will make the rooftop more visible. He stated that he supports the developer working with staff regarding Green Building standards and energy issues. He advised that he would recommend leaving the trash enclosure as shown on the plan. He noted that a condition of approval has been included which prohibits dental and medical uses in the building, and, consequently there will be no biological hazardous waste. He advised that he feels the City and the developer should share the cost of the fence and staff should work as an arbitrator regarding the issue of the fence. Commissioner Roberts stated that it has been known for years that this lot has been zoned commercial/office. She noted that this does change the neighborhood, but she agrees that this is a gorgeous building. She commented that single-story buildings are usually push-up concrete structures. She further noted that in order to attain the square-footage in a single-story building they would have to utilize the entire site and this would not allow appropriate on-site parking. Commissioner Roberts stated that she agrees lowering the building two feet will not make any significant difference for views. She also stated that she feels the building is far enough away so that views into windows should not be a consideration. She commented that she feels it is an attractive building for the entrance to the City. r Commissioner Roberts stated that she would support the Gudaitis' request for 30 inches of wrought iron fencing at the end of their property. She also indicated that she would prefer retaining walls over contour grading for the parking lot, thereby allowing the increase of the PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 24, 2001 Page 8