My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 012401
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2001
>
PC 012401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 4:35:59 PM
Creation date
3/27/2003 7:27:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/24/2001
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 012401
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />and location. He advised that this application would go forward to the City Council for review <br />r and final approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kameny noted that there appears to be a lot of landscaping along the area of the <br />proposed trash enclosure that would hide the enclosure and it would be more attractive to keep it <br />away from the building. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry from Commissioner Roberts, Mr. Pavan advised that the fill was added <br />to the site when Greenbriar did construction along Sunol and Sycamore to extend the sewer line. <br />Mr. Pavan confirmed that portions of Sunol Boulevard are higher than the site. <br /> <br />COMMENTS FROM THE APPLICANT <br /> <br />Jeff Antrim, 1883 Zenato Place, advised that he is one of the three owners of the proposed <br />project. He noted that they have had three neighborhood meetings and have made their best <br />efforts to make this project a success for everyone. He noted that because this is one of the first <br />buildings that will be seen when entering Pleasanton, they have tried to make a statement with <br />the building concept. He noted that the first proposal was a cost effective plan that did not meet <br />with the surrounding neighbors' expectations. He advised that the developer then hired an <br />architectural team to develop a proposal for the building. Mr. Antrim stated that he hopes that <br />staff sees the effort between the three partners and residents to make this project a success. <br /> <br />r' <br /> <br />Timothy Bowe, Architectural Resources Collaborative, Inc. 940 Tyler Street, Suite 23, Benicia, <br />the architect for the project, advised that the developers were committed to doing an exemplary <br />project. He noted that the palette of materials was selected because of the residential area <br />located nearby. He described the design, architectural elements, and materials for the proposed <br />building. Mr. Bowe commented that the height of the building that is proposed is not as tall as <br />many homes. He noted that by pushing the building further into the ground would create a <br />situation where the homes behind it would be looking at more and more roof and the mechanical <br />equipment, rather than the fa<;:ade of the building. Mr. Bowe reported that Sunol Blvd. is higher <br />than the pad elevation in many locations and they do not want to create the illusion that the <br />building is sitting down in a hole. With regard to the trash enclosure, Mr. Bowe advised that the <br />original proposal was to place it back in the far corner of the parking lot where it could be well <br />screened with landscaping. He noted that they still feel this is the appropriate location and that to <br />move it closer to the building would make it more visible to adjacent neighbors and the users of <br />the building. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Commissioner Kameny, it was noted that the trash enclosure is <br />approximately 90 feet from the nearest home. <br /> <br />r' <br /> <br />Commissioner Roberts asked for clarification regarding the applicant's position regarding the <br />chain link fence. Mr. Hirst of South Front Investors advised that they feel it is the City's fence, <br />and what they want to do with the fence is up to the City. He advised that they are willing to <br />share the cost 50/50 of whatever the City wants to do. He further advised that they feel it is the <br />City's responsibility to work with the neighbors to decide the type of fence that should be <br />installed. Mr. Jost noted that the fence was installed with the Diamond Court development, but <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES <br /> <br />January 24, 2001 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.