My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
090710
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/3/2010 9:41:09 AM
Creation date
9/3/2010 9:40:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/7/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
biological impacts are the same, there are no increased traffic conditions in the area over time, <br />and staff does not believe this is necessary. <br />Councilmember McGovern said she understands there is a project coming forward possibly in <br />the near future and when it comes forward, she asked if the development agreement would <br />need to be changed. Mr. Dolan said not necessarily; the agreement as written provides a <br />framework which anticipates subsequent approvals. At this time, staff does not believe it will <br />need to be amended. <br />Councilmember McGovern questioned whether eight buildings of 750,000 square feet and an <br />additional project would be allowed, and Mr. Dolan said yes; the subsequent project reduces the <br />amount of office building to something in the 500,000 square foot range. In order to <br />accommodate the retail, reduction of the office square footage must be done. He said the land <br />is proposed to be displaced by a retail center of approximately 130,000 or so square feet. <br />Mr. Fialho noted that the Council would be approving a modified PUD which would layer over <br />the development agreement and assumes retail and roughly 500,000 square feet of commercial <br />development. He noted there has also been discussion of the site potentially becoming a <br />receiver site for housing to assist with RHNA obligations. <br />Councilmember McGovern said she had asked the City Manager how many jobs equated from <br />475,000 square feet which was around 3,000 jobs. Mr. Fialho added that if one were to assume <br />each employee has about 250 square feet of dedicated office space, this adds up to about <br />3,000 depending upon the employer. Councilmember McGovern confirmed this would not stop <br />the City from working with the owner to review different types of development on the property, <br />and Mr. Fialho added that he believes the owner is motivated to do this. <br />Vice Mayor Thorne opened the public hearing. <br />Scott Trobbe, Pleasanton Gateway, LLC, thanked Mr. Dolan for his thorough presentation, and <br />said he has been developing a variety of buildings in the Bay Area for close to 30 years and is <br />embarrassed that they have not been able to execute on this particular property in the last 10 <br />years. He discussed his personal and professional motivations, noting that when they began the <br />project in 2000, they had a lot of initial activity. They met with companies like Sun Microsystems, <br />Cisco, and even had a meeting to set a benchmark with Mayor Pico and Lockheed to attract <br />them to the property. But, the dot com came and the world changed. As a conservative <br />company, they never wanted a speculative office project there, and a vacant building is worse <br />than no building at all. Now, 10 years later there is a real estate market that is still suffering with <br />loans, regardless of what is heard in the media. He explained that the reason they are before <br />the Council today is because they feel they need the extension in order to provide the flexibility, <br />given their enormous investment, to court partners, banks, and tenants. Any tenant that wants <br />to come to the site will want to know what is happening with the rest of the site. <br />To that end, 3,000 jobs would be a dream, but he does not believe they will find one tenant to <br />take all 740,000 square feet. It will be in pieces, but they will want to tell their shareholders that <br />part of the land is entitled. <br />Mr. Trobbe stated their upcoming project will be before the Planning Commission next week. It <br />is exciting and leads to the next step of what happens with the balance of their land. They are <br />open and flexible in looking at other uses and would be happy to continue negotiations as the <br />City Council Minutes <br />Page 9 of 11 August 17, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.