My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051810
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
CCMIN051810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2010 12:00:48 PM
Creation date
7/27/2010 12:00:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/18/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN051810
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
have. The board will be comprised of 22 members and every jurisdiction in the County will be <br /> represented, as well as AC Transit and BART having rights and obligations. <br /> Regarding timelines, they have obtained approval from 9 of 14 cities, representing 75% of the <br /> population in the county. If approved by the City Council tonight and a few more cities this week, <br /> they could request the joint board to adopt the JPA and begin creating the ATC, which will meet <br /> and operate for the first time in September. <br /> Vice Mayor Thorne questioned whether City staff agrees with the voting distribution. Mr. Fialho <br /> said the distribution is a combination of ACTIA's current voting system and the ACCMA's. The <br /> City of Pleasanton, being under 100,000 in population, receives one vote. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan referred to page 3 of the staff report showing the breakdown of the <br /> voting distribution. He understands allocating additional votes to larger population jurisdictions, <br /> but did not understand the Board of Supervisors' allocations, stating they each have one vote <br /> except for the longest serving board member in attendance, which will have two votes. Mr. Dow <br /> said the Ad -Hoc Committee and the Joint Board discussed the issue of voting structure. The <br /> voting structure was put together via part science and part heart. Initially, the City of Oakland <br /> was supposed to have 3 votes; 2 for a senior member and 1 for a less senior member. Through <br /> the negotiation process, because Oakland has a 425,000 population, every 100,000 gets 1 vote. <br /> Therefore, Oakland has 4 votes. In order to balance out Oakland's vote, the Board of <br /> Supervisors requested and had approved 6 votes. Staff was not part of the decision- making <br /> process relative to the voting structure and the issue has been heavily negotiated over two or <br /> three meetings. <br /> Councilmember Sullivan confirmed that the longest voting Supervisor member of the combined <br /> committee is Supervisor Keith Carson, District 5, who represents the Oakland, Hercules, <br /> Emeryville areas. The way the JPA is written the Board of Supervisors gets the 6 vote only if <br /> the most senior member attends the meeting. If the alternate attends, they only get 1 vote. <br /> Councilmember Cook- Kallio said she was present when this was discussed and part of what <br /> resonated was that the Board of Supervisors have overlapping jurisdictions. Potentially, a <br /> member of the Board of Supervisors could represent cities like Pleasanton or Livermore and <br /> only have one vote, and this would give more push to things in our area. So, in addition to <br /> Supervisors, they also have overlapping jurisdictions. Mr. Dow agreed this was correct. <br /> Councilmember McGovern thinks the structure was somewhat unfair because it is based upon <br /> population in cities at 100,000. Every Supervisor represents part of that population. To think <br /> Oakland would have another vote does not make sense to her because they are already <br /> representing the people that their area of the County is in. <br /> Mayor Hosterman noted there were no speakers. <br /> Councilmember McGovern questioned if projects have already chosen would be funded by the <br /> new Commission. Mr. Dow said no and that one action the ACTC is to come up with a <br /> countywide transportation plan. In April, they embarked upon an effort to extend or re- authorize <br /> the current sales tax measure. From this, the new measure could potentially be used as a <br /> funding mechanism for that plan. From a planning perspective, the key purpose of the plan is to <br /> identify transportation problems throughout the county, quantify them, and hopefully recommend <br /> solutions. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 10 May 18, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.