My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
072010
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2010 11:45:33 AM
Creation date
7/14/2010 11:45:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> Since 1988, the City has been a member of a joint powers authority called the Bay <br /> Cities Joint Powers Insurance Authority (Bay Cities). Members of Bay Cities (of which <br /> there are 17) "pool" resources to provide coverage for various losses above a member's <br /> self retained limit. By pooling resources, there is a larger payroll base that spreads the <br /> risk of claims and allows, for example, Bay Cities to purchase excess coverage at a <br /> more favorable rate than if individual members attempted to purchase such coverage on <br /> their own. Bay Cities offers a variety of programs such as liability, employment <br /> practices, property damage and workers' compensation. <br /> As to the workers compensation program, most Bay Cities members who participate <br /> "pool" losses above the member's self retained limit. In turn, Bay Cities itself is a <br /> member of a separate joint powers authority, the Local Agency Workers Compensation <br /> Excess Joint Powers Authority (LAWCX), and member entities who have workers <br /> compensation claims that exceed the pool coverage (and that limit varies between <br /> $150,000 and $1,000,000) have coverage by and through LAWCX. <br /> LAWCX was formed on July 1, 1992, as a state -wide joint powers authority to self- insure <br /> and pool excess workers' compensation losses. LAWCX was established for California <br /> self- insured workers' compensation joint powers authorities, individual agencies and <br /> special districts. LAWCX is governed by a Board of Directors with a representative from <br /> each member entity. Each member may cast weighted votes allocated by LAWCX <br /> based on the total payroll of that agency. <br /> LAWCX provides for the establishment, operation, and maintenance of excess workers' <br /> compensation coverage for its member agencies. LAWCX also offers actuarial and <br /> claims management services. <br /> For many years, the City purchased excess workers compensation through private <br /> insurance. When the cost of that insurance increased significantly, the City decided to <br /> join the Bay Cities workers compensation program in order for the City to be able to <br /> obtain excess workers compensation coverage (through LAWCX) at a more favorable <br /> rate. At that time, however, the third party administrator (TPA) for workers <br /> compensation claims utilized by Bay Cities was not the same as the TPA that the City <br /> has utilized for many years (Innovative Claims Solutions [ICS]) and the City —if it <br /> participated fully in the Bay Cities workers compensation program -stood to lose the <br /> personalized service and excellent results that ICS had provided. Accordingly, even <br /> though the City participated in the Bay Cities workers compensation program —and <br /> hence paid a pro rata share of the administrative costs —the City, by reason of its <br /> separate contract with ICS and certain programs that the City itself has developed, has <br /> not gotten all the administrative services and programs that other members have <br /> received. <br /> Recently ICS became the TPA for Bay Cities. In light of that change, City staff did a <br /> thorough review of the services the City would receive and the costs that the City would <br /> incur if it elected not to renew its separate contract with ICS and, instead, utilized all the <br /> services through Bay Cities for which it has been paying. Alternatively, City staff <br /> investigated whether it might be more fiscally prudent no longer to participate in the Bay <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.