Laserfiche WebLink
The draft Final Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment/Staples Ranch EIR <br /> Supplement (Final SEIR) includes responses to comments on the Draft SEIR raised <br /> during the public review period, and includes revisions intended to correct, clarify, and <br /> amplify the Draft SEIR. If certified, the SEIR, along with the EIR certified by the City <br /> Council on February 24, 2009, would compose the entire EIR for the project. <br /> The SEIR is before the Council for review and certification. <br /> Lawsuit <br /> A lawsuit challenging the City of Pleasanton's approval of the Staples Ranch Specific <br /> Plan Amendment was filed on March 27, 2009. The lawsuit claimed, in part, that the <br /> City of Pleasanton should have recirculated the EIR with a new analysis of the impacts <br /> of the Four -Lane Concurrent Extension and that the EIR's analysis of the impacts of the <br /> Four -Lane Concurrent Extension and the EIR's analysis of biological resources, <br /> greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and cumulative quarry impacts were insufficient. <br /> This lawsuit settled in September 2009. <br /> In an effort to address the concerns raised in the lawsuit, the SEIR also includes the <br /> results of updated biological surveys for sensitive species which could be impacted by <br /> the Staples Ranch project. In addition, because of the rapidly changing legal framework <br /> for the analysis of potential impacts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, the SEIR also <br /> provides an updated analysis of that issue. Concerns raised over the potential <br /> cumulative impacts of the project in conjunction with the quarry operations located to <br /> the south of the Staples Ranch site are also addressed. <br /> The lawsuit settlement agreement contemplates that the City Council may rescind its <br /> adopted CEQA Findings, SOC, MMRP, the SPA, and the pre- zoning /rezoning for the <br /> Staples Ranch site and then adopt new or revised CEQA Findings, SOC, MMRP, SPA, <br /> and pre- zoning /rezoning. Based on the SEIR, the CEQA Findings, SOC, MMRP, and <br /> SPA have been revised and staff is recommending these documents be approved <br /> following rescission of the existing approvals. The pre- zoning /rezoning ordinance has <br /> not changed but must also be rescinded /readopted to be in compliance with the <br /> Settlement Agreement. <br /> PREFERRED PROJECT <br /> Staff and the Planning Commission recommend the "Preferred Project" be adopted. <br /> The Preferred Project is the Four -Lane Concurrent Extension Alternative with a phasing <br /> modification. If the Preferred Project is adopted, the road and both bridges would be <br /> constructed to accommodate two lanes of travel in each direction. However, both <br /> bridges would be striped such that there would be only one lane of travel in each <br /> direction with an expectation that in the future the City Council would approve the <br /> bridges to be restriped to accommodate two lanes of traffic in each direction. The <br /> mitigation measures that would be adopted and implemented for the Preferred Project <br /> would be the same as the Four -Lane Concurrent Extension Alternative. As a result, no <br /> additional environmental review would be required to transition from the two lanes of <br /> traffic on the bridges to the full four lanes. <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br />