Laserfiche WebLink
Filling this channel will require review under permit applications by the United States Army <br />Corps of Engineers (USACE), the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), the <br />California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), and the United States Fish and Wildlife <br />Service (USFWS). However, as previously stated, removal of the oak trees and other <br />native tree species in this area is opposed by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS), <br />California Oaks Association (COA), and the California Ohlone Audubon Society (COAS). <br />The Planning Commission also directed staff at its April 13, 2007 public hearing to <br />preserve these trees. <br />Staff regrets the inability to secure both goals of the Planning Commission: construct the <br />entire bike lane and preserve this group of trees. However, to extend the bike lane across <br />the entire frontage requires street widening that must fill a channel due to the location of <br />existing developments and natural features on both sides of Foothill Road in this area. A <br />significant section of bicycle lane will be constructed contributing to the completion of a <br />southbound bicycle lane on the west side of Foothill Road and the existing trees will be <br />preserved. <br />Existing Entrance Gate from Foothill Road <br />Figure 13, below, is a photograph of the existing access gate across the private street <br />serving the Yee and Fuller Smathers properties. <br />Figure 13: The existing access gate off Foothill Road to the Yee and Fuller properties. <br />As shown in Figure 11 (Page 19), the applicants will move the gate approximately 75 to 80 <br />feet farther up the private street from its present location. The applicants and the Fuller <br />Smathers families want to retain the gated access for the reasons including peace and <br />privacy, safety and security. The applicants have stated that they have been impacted by <br />Item 6.b., PUD- 87- 19 -03M <br />Page 21 of 37 April 28, 2010 <br />