Laserfiche WebLink
General Fund Expenditures Specific expenditure adjustments are summarized below <br /> in Table 5. <br /> Table 5. General Fund Expenditure Adjustments <br /> Expenditure Adjustments FY 2009 -10 <br /> Additional Vacancy Savings (69,550) <br /> Reduction in Budgeted Contingency (63,787) <br /> Transportation for Clean Air Grant prior year carryover inadvertantly omitted 9,000 <br /> Total (124,337) <br /> Expenditure adjustments include 3 months additional vacancy savings for the remainder <br /> of the fiscal year for a Financial Services Manager and 0.5 FTE Library Clerk, a <br /> carryover inadvertently omitted for the remainder of the grant funded Employee and <br /> Resident Transportation Survey, and a reduction in the budgeted contingency which is <br /> the difference needed to keep the budget in balance. <br /> General Fund Reserve Designations There are no recommended changes to <br /> General Fund Reserves beyond those previously adopted with the Mid -Year Operating <br /> Budget update. <br /> Table 6. Summa of Fund Balance Reserve Desi nations General Fund <br /> Additional <br /> Beginning Recommended Ending <br /> General Fund Fund Balance Fund Changes to Fund <br /> Reserve Designations Balance Reserves Balance <br /> Reserve for Carryovers 2,097,091 2,097,091 <br /> 10% Reserve for Economic <br /> Uncertainties 8,320,000 8,320,000 <br /> Capital Projects Reserve <br /> Reserve for Golf Debt Service 2,000,000 2,000,000 <br /> Temporary Recession Reserve 11,170,000 11,170,000 <br /> Total 23,587,089 23,587,089 <br /> Enterprise Funds Overview <br /> Recommended adjustments for Enterprise Funds include a net increase of $107,553 for <br /> the Senior Para Transit Fund. This is a combination of the following changes. <br /> Increase of $98,583 from the Measure B Gap Grant for reimbursement of a new <br /> bus purchase <br /> Increase in Gap Grant funding agreement of $26,423 <br /> Reduction of $6,120 in Senior Transit Fares due to fewer requests for door -to- <br /> door service in favor of the fixed route service <br /> Reduction of $4,889 resulting from a 12% reduction in program funding imposed <br /> by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). <br /> Page 4 of 5 <br />