10 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

not be determined until after mining activities are completed, the Pleasanton Plan shpu ates that the line be re- evaluated at su as co '.rehensive rr i use es are coup Bred for rec lands, The eastern U sou of the quarry lands is coternunous with the Pleasanton/ Livermore city lintil line as it extends through the Ruby Hill development. The UGB to the south is based upon physical terrain as it extends along the base ofthe steep hills that enclose the Happy Valley area_ It is also situated in nearby billy locations to accommodate future development which has been permitted by the General Plan for many years. C. Lower densities should be encouraged along the inside edge of the UGB to provide a transition/buffer for preventing potential conflicts with uses immediately beyond the boundary such as agriculture and midlands. D. In order to implement the UGB, the Land Use Element of the General Plan adopted August 6, 1996 provides Policy 11 and its related programs as follows: Policy 11: Maintain a permanent Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) beyond which urban development shall not be permitted. Program 11.1: Permit only non -urban uses beyond the UGB. Program 11.2: Extend Urban Services only to areas within the UGB, with the following possible exceptions for selected Urban Services: (1) areas beyond the UGB where the public health and safety present overriding considerations; (2) as to water service, areas which are within the boundaries of the forma Plasanton County Township Water District and where the service extension is consistent with the 1967 Joint Powers Agreement between the City and the District; and (3) on reclaimed land which is currently designated as Sand and Gravel Harvesting in East Pleasanton when the potential future use is non urban. Program 11.3: Because the UGB is considered to be permanent, future adjustments to the line's location are discouraged; provided, however, minor adjustments may be granted that meet all the following: (1) are otherwise consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan; (2) would not have a significant adverse impact on agriculture, wildland areas, or scenic ridgeline views; (3) are contiguous with existing urban development or with property for which all discretionary approvals for urban development have been granted; (4) would not induce further adjustments to the boundary; and (5) demonstrate toamalISUaer uns2JAM 2