Laserfiche WebLink
1.4 Projection of Operation and Maintenance Expenses <br /> Operation and maintenance (O &M) expenses are incurred by the City to collect and convey <br /> wastewater. O &M expenses are expensed during the current year and are not capitalized or <br /> amortized over an extended period of years. <br /> In general, operation and maintenance expenses are grouped into a number of different <br /> functional categories, planning, collection, etc. To begin the process of projecting O &M <br /> expenses over the planning horizon, escalation factors were developed, generally ranging from <br /> 3% to 3.5 <br /> HDR began with the City's projected expenses for the operating and maintenance expenses for <br /> the early years of the planning horizon. HDR then escalated the O &M expenses based upon the <br /> escalation factors. Total operation and maintenance expenses for the City are projected to be <br /> approximately $2.7 million in FY 2010. O &M expenses are projected to increase to <br /> approximately $3.3 million by FY 2017, primarily as a result of the assumed inflation over that <br /> time period. <br /> 1.5 Projection of Sewer Capital Improvement Projects <br /> Funded from Rate Revenues <br /> The City has a significant amount of local sewer capital improvement projects planned over the <br /> planning horizon. More importantly, in looking beyond the next eight years, the number and size <br /> of the replacement sewer projects is anticipated to ramp up significantly. The City and its <br /> engineering firm are in the process of developing a Water and Wastewater Asset Management <br /> Study, which includes an analysis of the local sewer collection and pumping system. The value <br /> of the Asset Management Study to this rate study is that it provided a road map of where the City <br /> should probably be positioned in eight years, as it relates to capital improvement funding from <br /> rates and capital reserve fund balances. This aspect is discussed in more detail below. <br /> There are a number of different methods that may be used to fund the projected capital <br /> improvement projects. Among the methods that may be used to finance these capital <br /> improvement projects are long -term debt, capital reserves and rates. It is through the use of a <br /> combination of these financing resources that the City can minimize their rates through time. <br /> A general financial guideline that can be used to determine <br /> proper funding levels for capital improvements from rates "A general financial guideline <br /> is that, at a minimum, a utility should fund an amount equal that can be used to determine <br /> to or greater than annual depreciation expenses. Annual proper funding levels for capital <br /> depreciation expense reflects the current investment in improvements from rates is that, <br /> at a minimum, a utility should <br /> plant that is being depreciated or "losing" its useful life. fund an amount equal to or <br /> Therefore, this portion of plant investment needs to be greater than annual depreciation <br /> replaced to maintain the existing level of infrastructure. It ex <br /> must be kept in mind that, in theory, annual depreciation <br /> expense reflects an investment in infrastructure an average <br /> of fifteen (15) years ago, assuming a 30 -year useful (depreciable) life. Simply funding an <br /> amount equal to annual depreciation expense will not be sufficient to replace the existing or <br /> Development of the Revenue Requirement 1-0 <br /> Ma City of Pleasanton Local Sewer Rate Study <br />