Laserfiche WebLink
<br />EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />Siqnificant Effects and Pindinqs <br /> <br />For purposes of this Exhibit, the Hacienda Business Park <br />is referred to as the "Project" and the Amendment to the Growth <br />Management Element is referred to as the "Amendment". <br /> <br />I. Land Use and Planning. <br /> <br />A. Siqnificant Effect. potential regional surplus of <br />land committed to commercial/industrial development <br />resulting in delay in Project buildout or abandonment <br />of Project in partially built state. <br /> <br />a.l Finding. Area phasing of project development is <br />infeasible due to economic considerations. <br /> <br />a.2 Fact. Developer has completed in-tract streets <br />and utilities for the entire Project. Allowing <br />Developer to develop and market the project as <br />market conditions dictate will minimize the <br />likelihood of delay in Project buildout or aban- <br />donment of the Project in a partially built <br />state. Different uses are located throughout <br />the Project making phased development by area <br />impractical. <br /> <br />a.3 Fact. The project is located at the inter- <br />section of 1-580 and 1-680, an area well suited <br />for large scale urban infill and more likely <br />than less favored locations to build-out as <br />scheduled. <br /> <br />a.4 Fact. The notion of phased project development <br />is inconsistent with city's requirement that the <br />public improvements related to the project be <br />built in one phase. <br /> <br />a.5 Findinq. The Residential Community Alternative, <br />Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No <br />project Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative <br />could partially mitigate the potential signi- <br />ficant effect. However, each of these Alterna- <br />tives is infeasible. <br /> <br />1. <br />