ORD 1109 - Laserfiche WebLink

relatively isolated from schools, some types of retail shopping and other community services generally desired to be close to residential developments. Liens resulting from assessments to finance the infrastructure mandate develop- ment of commercial and industrial uses at pro- posed densities. I. Monitoring of Development Alternative. (Final EIR Comment K) . i.l Findinq. A suggested mitigation, phase de- velopment in City by monitoring development and resricting growth to two million square feet every five years, is unnecessary as environ- mental impacts will be mitigated. i.2 Fact. The recommended mitigation is unnecessary because (I) environmental impacts of development are mitigated by mitigation measures and condi- tions of approval as described in Sections I through X of this Resolution and (2) City poli- cies allow for control of development on a building-by-building basis with respect to traffic, air and public services impacts. XIII. Growth Inducement. A. Siqnificant Effect. Growth-inducing impacts asso- ciated with provisions of basic employment, removal of flood hazards, generation of more jobs than em- ployees can be housed locally, and construction of water and sewage treatment and other service facilities likely sized for additional growth. a.l Finding. Growth-inducing impacts have been analyzed separately under each subject matter heading herein and have been found to be avoided or substantially lessened because of the incor- poration of feasible mitigation measures, or have been found unavoidable because mitigation measures and alternatives have been found to be infeasible. a.2 Fact. See Sections I through XII, including but not limited to, Sections I.a.2, I.a.4, I.a.6, I.c.2, I.c.3, I.c.5, II.a.2, II.a.3, III.a.2, IV.a.2, IV.a.4, IV.b.7, IV.b.2, IV.c.2, IV.c.5, and all facts supporting infeasibility of the Alternatives in Section XII. 24.