ORD 1109 - Laserfiche WebLink

authorized for some facilities, and improvements are anticipated to be completed in 1986. a.5 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative could partially mitigate the effect. However, each of these Alternatives is infeasible and unnecessary as the mitigation measures incorporated into the Project will substantially lessen the significant effect. a.6 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of Alternatives) . a.7 Fact. See Sections IV.a.4, IV.a.2 (Water demand mitigations). B. Siqnificant Effect. Large increase in water use on site. b.l Finding. The mitigation measure incorporated into the Project to control water use will substantially lessen the effect. b.2 Fact. Condition No. 48 requires installation of water conserving plumbing fixtures. b.3 Finding. The Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative, No Project Alternative, Partial Approval Alternative or Mixed Use Alternative could partially mitigate the effect. However, each of these Alternatives is infeasible and unnecessary as the mitigation measures incor- porated into the Project will substantially lessen the significant effect. b.4 Fact. See Section XII (for infeasibility of Alternatives). b.5 Fac~. S~~ S~ction IV.b.2 (Water conservation mitigations). b.6 Finding. The recommended mitigation measures, of minimizing landscaping water use and indus- trial water use, are unnecessary. 9.