Laserfiche WebLink
The report recommended that in order to meet the needs of the very low- income senior <br /> population, the City's best efforts would be to acquire a site that is neither Kottinger Place nor <br /> Pleasanton Gardens. <br /> An organized group of residents met with the Bernal Property task force to reserve roughly 5 <br /> acres of the total site for such a project but the initiation of Measure B ultimately stalled that <br /> effort. Staff and residents then considered several alternative sites before returning to the <br /> pursuit of a project at Kottinger Place. <br /> Mr. Bocian stated that at the same approximate time, Pleasanton Gardens reached out to the <br /> Housing Commission and expressed an interest in a cooperative project. The Council <br /> authorized staff to move forward with investigating potential development options for the two <br /> sites and also form a project task force. The task force contracted with Christian Church Homes <br /> to conduct a predevelopment study and involved the public through a series of neighborhood <br /> and tenant outreach meetings. A predevelopment analysis for the 2 sites considered various <br /> development options which incorporated both rehabilitation on one or both sites and new <br /> development at one or both sites. Mr. Bocian noted that while both properties are well <br /> maintained and in good condition, the units themselves do not meet current building standards <br /> and do not lend themselves to senior needs; neither would be sufficiently addressed by <br /> rehabilitation. New development options included a 128 -unit project on the Kottinger site and <br /> rehabilitation of Pleasanton Gardens, a joint project of 174 units on both sites (60 of which <br /> would be on the Pleasanton Gardens site), 112 -unit project on the Kottinger site, and a <br /> combined development of 150 units that required reducing some of the surrounding park land. <br /> In June 2008, the task force recommended a conceptual site plan to the City Council which <br /> combined options 4 and 5 into a 150 -unit development using a combination of 2 and 3 -story <br /> design. Mr. Bocian reviewed photos, layout, and existing conditions at both sites, briefly outlined <br /> the 3 proposed design alternatives, and deferred to the architect for a more detailed <br /> presentation. He noted that a number of 2 -story footprint options were considered and said that <br /> following the Council's request to study a 2 -story design, the task force settled on retaining the <br /> footprint but reducing the overall mass to 2 stories and 128 units. He noted that certain <br /> residents from Kottinger Drive near the adjacent creek have expressed concerns over the <br /> building's height and overall mass and said that the task force has recommended that the <br /> Council begin tree plantings in this area. <br /> Mr. Bocian stated that the development concepts include the construction of a new 3 -story, 150 <br /> unit development that replaces Kottinger Place and Pleasanton Gardens with the goal of <br /> retaining the low- income status and rents currently offered at both. The plan is relocate the then <br /> current tenants to the new development of studio and 1- bedroom units. A redevelopment report <br /> was prepared to facilitate this process and relies on keeping vacant units open at both sites to <br /> accommodate residents of Kottinger Place during the construction process. He stated that some <br /> offsite relocation may ultimately be required and added that staff, the task force, and the <br /> Pleasanton Gardens are very focused on minimizing it to the extent possible. The construction <br /> process includes 2 phases to minimize relocation impacts and accommodate the types of <br /> financing considered and would retain the entire Kottinger Village Community Park, utilizes the <br /> Regalia House site, and removes the associated building. <br /> Mr. Bocian reviewed the preliminary financing plan although noted that the specifics do not <br /> materialize until very late in the development process and after a developer is on board. He <br /> stated that the proposed 150 -unit and 128 -unit designs carry an estimated cost of $44 million <br /> and $38 million respectively. Both options carry heavy funding presumptions and estimated <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 16 December 1, 2009 <br />