My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
020210
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2010 4:43:42 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 2:29:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/2/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
General Plan and HVSP for additional Tots is not warranted. Staff acknowledges that the <br /> "surplus" units could be looked at as available units for other property owners that wish to <br /> develop above their properties' designated density allocation, but that was not the intent of the <br /> HVSP. <br /> The property is not visible from public streets and is only visible from the golf course. The <br /> adjacent Serenity project, even though it is not built out yet, has a tighter lot pattern than what <br /> is being proposed with this application, but this project has the benefit of including some open <br /> space which would break up the more suburban lot pattern. <br /> While the property, with six homes, would "visually" be similar to some of the surrounding <br /> developments in the HVSP, nearby developments with one acre lots have also included <br /> substantial open space parcels that contribute to the semi -rural character of the area. This <br /> proposal does not. Staff believes that the development of the property at the proposed density <br /> would be inconsistent with Policy 18 of the Community Character Element of the General Plan <br /> to "preserve the semi -rural character of the Happy Valley area <br /> The Specific Plan was approved to implement the City's General Plan for the Happy Valley <br /> area. Amending the General Plan and the HVSP in order to allow this project to proceed <br /> would be inconsistent with the policies and programs of those Plans and would not conform to <br /> the vision that the Council has created for this area. Accordingly, staff recommends that the <br /> proposed amendments and the project be denied. <br /> Photomontages <br /> In staffs opinion, the photomontages support the conclusion that increasing the number of lots <br /> above three would diminish the rural character of the area. The five and six lot patterns have <br /> a suburban appearance and no open space to break up the lot patterns. The increase in <br /> density, although visually similar to adjoining developments, is less consistent with the intent of <br /> the character of the Happy Valley area. Please refer to Attachment 3, Exhibit C for the <br /> photomontages and lot layouts with three, five, and six lots. <br /> If, however, the Commission decides to provide a favorable recommendation to the City <br /> Council on the amendments and the PUD development plan, a discussion of the project <br /> particulars is provided below. <br /> Design and Site Development Standards <br /> Proposed Design Guidelines: The proposed design guidelines have been written to be similar <br /> to the design guidelines of both the Mariposa Ranch and Serenity projects. The design criteria <br /> contained in the proposed design guidelines are detailed and comprehensive. The guidelines <br /> include the setbacks, building height, and floor area ratio for the development and also cover <br /> the recommended architectural styles, landscaping, fencing, etc. The detail of architectural <br /> elements, such as dormers, shutters, bay windows, roofline, etc., ensures successful <br /> translation from guideline statements to physical designs. Staff believes that the proposed <br /> guidelines provide a comprehensive level of detail and direction for future homeowners <br /> regarding all aspects of the designs of their homes. <br /> PUD- 75/PGPA -14 /PSPA -3: Wentworth Planning Commission <br /> Page 8 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.