My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
020210
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2010 4:43:42 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 2:29:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/2/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Improvements <br /> The existing chain link wood slated fence currently separating the subject site from the golf <br /> course would be replaced with a powder coated wrought iron fence. Each of the homes, when <br /> developed, would be required to achieve a minimum of 150 green points, exceeding the City's <br /> Municipal Code requirement by 100 points. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to dedicate <br /> to the City an easement to the existing well and the right to use the water from the well should <br /> the City choose to maintain and use the well to provide water to the golf course. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Amendments <br /> General Plan: The General Plan land use designation for the subject site is Low Density <br /> Residential (one dwelling unit per 2 gross acres). This land use designation would support <br /> three housing units. Therefore, to allow this proposal, the General Plan Land Use map would <br /> need to be amended to less than 2 dwelling unit per gross acre to allow more than three lots. <br /> Happy Valley Specific Plan (HVSP): The land use designation for the property is PUD -SRDR <br /> which allows a maximum density of one lot per two acres, thus restricting the number of total <br /> units at this site to three. Therefore, the proposed project would require the land use <br /> designation to be changed to PUD -LDR (Planned Unit Development -Low Density Residential) <br /> to increase the allowable density for the subject site and reduce the size of the parcels. <br /> The HVSP allows for flexibility in site development standards (e.g., lot size, dimensions, <br /> building setbacks, etc.) for "unusual site conditions as long as any new standards are <br /> consistent with the intent of the Specific Plan." Here, however, there is nothing particularly <br /> unusual about the site to warrant an increase in the density. <br /> The applicant feels that a homeowner is not going to landscape a two -acre site and, therefore, <br /> could create an eyesore next to the golf course. As proposed, the majority of the lots would be <br /> less than an acre in size and would be required, under design guidelines, to be completely <br /> landscaped prior to occupancy and therefore, according to the applicant, would provide for an <br /> attractive project adjacent to the Callippe Preserve Golf Course. (This is similar to what was <br /> proposed during the processing of Serenity at Callippe; in that case, the lots were approved at <br /> less than one acre in size.). <br /> A comparison chart of adjacent developments showing that the proposed project would have <br /> similar, or in some instances more restrictive, development standards is provided in <br /> Attachment 5, Exhibit E. To ensure that there is still a "rural" feel to the site, the applicant has <br /> proposed larger setbacks and a lower FAR as "compensation" for the increase in the allowable <br /> density. To assist in how this could look, the site plan (Attachment 2, Exhibit B) includes <br /> building footprints of previously approved homes in the Happy Valley area and a <br /> corresponding streetscape view of those homes from the golf course. <br /> Staff has considered the issue of potentially overbuilding this particular site in comparison to <br /> what was originally approved. Staff concludes, however, that although there have been fewer <br /> units approved in the HVSP area as compared to what was first contemplated, amending the <br /> PUD- 75/PGPA -14 /PSPA -3: Wentworth Planning Commission <br /> Page 7 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.