My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
020210
>
08 ATTACHMENTS 4-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2010 4:43:42 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 2:29:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/2/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 5 <br /> PUD -75 /PGPA -14 /PSPA -3, Don Babbitt/Heartwood Communities <br /> Application to amend the General Plan and the Happy Valley Specific Plan; and <br /> for Planned Unit Development rezoning and development plan approval for <br /> additional lots over the allotted number for the 6.13 -acre parcel located at <br /> 1157 Happy Valley Road. Zoning for the property is PUD -SRDR (Planned Unit <br /> Development Semi -Rural Density Residential) District. <br /> Ms. Amos presented the staff report and described the background, layout, and key <br /> elements of the project. She noted that in one of the visuals, a tree was omitted in error <br /> and will remain in place. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> Don Babbitt, applicant, apologized for the mistake in the visual regarding the tree that <br /> was removed and indicated that the consultant would put it back. He stated that back in <br /> April, some of the Commissioners had requested a photomontage of the development <br /> as viewed from the golf course. He indicated that they had met with staff and the <br /> Commissioners at the project site and walked the golf course. He noted that in the <br /> three five and six -lot plans, with the tree in place, the development is not quite visible <br /> from the gold course. He stated that the development standards for this project exceed <br /> those of the Mariposa Ranch and Serenity Terrace projects. He added that they are <br /> proposing wrought iron fencing and a deep well on the property that could be used for <br /> emergency purposes for the golf course. He indicated that he would be happy to <br /> answer any questions regarding the photomontages and the green points. <br /> Commissioner Blank asked Mr. Babbitt if he was still proposing the six lots. <br /> Mr. Babbitt replied that at this point, they were open to the five -lot plan. <br /> Commissioner Narum asked Mr. Babbitt if he was considering setting aside a piece of <br /> land for open space as part of the five -lot plan. <br /> Mr. Babbitt replied that he had a discussion with staff regarding this matter and that he <br /> believes the development would look better with houses and some larger separation, <br /> possibly a conservation easement along the creek. He stated that he was trying to <br /> avoid an empty lot that would require maintenance by a homeowners association. <br /> Commissioner Narum inquired if there was an open space in the Serenity Terrace <br /> development. <br /> Mr. Babbitt said yes, adding that the open space was deeded to the City with the trail <br /> system and the mitigation and construction of the 15`" fairway. He noted that they <br /> applied for a minor modification and will now put in place a maintenance agreement <br /> rather than a homeowners association as there is no common land owned by the <br /> property owners. <br /> EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 28, 2009 Page 1 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.