My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 110509 Special Meeting
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 110509 Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:38 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:46:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/5/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Olson agreed that there is no “Pleasanton look” but that he liked the <br />Sharks sign. <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that another option might be that the signs for the park on the <br />west end and northeast end of the site could relate more to City parks and they would <br />keep the Sharks Ice signs the same. <br />Commissioner Blank said he did not want to remove the Sharks’ branding and thinks <br />continuity of the theme is important; however, when he saw the night view of the sign <br />with the City of Pleasanton being blue, it did not seem consistent. He noted that it might <br />work when he sees the more detailed rendering. <br />Commissioner Narum noted that the park entry signs at the west and east end will be <br />the standard monument signs that are in all City parks, and the signs for the Sharks’ <br />facility will be in the center. <br />Mr. Rasmussen stated that the one with the reader board along the top is at the entry <br />way to the Sharks’ parking lot. He confirmed they were proposing to have the signs <br />developed at the two park entries and that if the City’s expectation was to have more of <br />the traditional park sign design there, they could do that. He indicated that the <br />Commission could add a condition to bring back the standard sign; otherwise, the sign <br />Chair Pearce presented would be used twice, and the reader board sign would be <br />located at the entryway to the parks. <br />Ms. Giffin stated that this is not how the project is conditioned and that if these signs <br />were changed to the other signs shown in the sign package, they would be outside of <br />the lease area and would then be have to be maintained by the City. She indicated that <br />as proposed and the way it is conditioned, all Sharks signs would be in the lease area <br />and not in the other areas of the Park. She added that it would be awkward to extend <br />the lease area for the signs, but that theoretically, the signs could be brought <br />somewhere else within the leased area. <br />Chair Pearce referred to the preliminary materials pallet, specifically the picnic table. <br />She indicated that she uses the picnic tables at Valle Vista Park and they have umbrella <br />holders. She inquired if it would be possible to substitute tables that have umbrella <br />holders as some of the tables proposed are not under the shade. <br />Mr. Fulford replied that this could be done. <br />Chair Pearce stated that the users would provide their own umbrellas. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Scott Raty, Pleasanton Chamber of Commerce, referred to the mural in the back of the <br />Chamber and inquired if it was any more or less Pleasanton colors than anything <br />proposed by the applicant tonight. He urged the Commission to allow the private sector <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, November 5, 2009 Page 16 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.