My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102809
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 102809
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:31 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:45:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/28/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Dolan replied that the decision would most likely be made on Friday. <br />Commissioner Olson inquired when the next regular meeting would be. <br />th <br />Mr. Dolan replied that it would be on November 18. He indicated that the <br />th <br />November 11 meeting was canceled due to the holiday. <br />Commissioner Olson advised that he would not be present at the November 18, 2009. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if there would be a meeting the week of Christmas. <br />Mr. Dolan said no; there would be only one meeting in December, on December 9, <br />2009. <br />b. Actions of the City Council <br />Commissioner Blank stated that this was a different version of what the Commission <br />discussed at the last meeting regarding the challenges staff faces of having to present <br />an opinion contrary to what staff supports. He indicated that at the last City Council <br />meeting, PRZ-48, the application to rezone three sites in Hacienda, was presented by <br />staff. He noted that the Commission voted 5-0 to support two or the three lots to be <br />rezoned and that there was a great deal of discussion as to whether it met the legal <br />requirement and provided some relief to the concerned public. He stated that he has <br />not seen the meeting video, but based on the staff report he read, he noted that while <br />the actions of the Planning Commission were adequately described, the reasons and <br />rationale for those actions were not; staff made a recommendation to the City Council to <br />approve all three lots without an explanation to the Council as to why the Planning <br />Commission recommended the rezoning of only two of the three lots. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he would again ask, especially in the case where the <br />Planning Commission votes unanimously, that if staff is going to make a contrary <br />recommendation, he believes it would be useful for the Planning Commission to get an <br />email notification ahead of time, as there may be things the Commission may wish to <br />expose to the City Council in the staff report so the Councilmembers might perhaps get <br />a better view of the Commission’s thinking. <br />Mr. Dolan replied that he understood the point; however, he does not have complete <br />control as to what is included in the staff report at the Council level. He stated that he <br />could raise the issue, but he indicated that the Commission should assume staff’s <br />recommendation will be the same to the City Council as that to the Planning <br />Commission in almost all cases, unless new information is received which has not been <br />considered. He noted that someone’s opinion would not necessarily change that <br />recommendation. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 28, 2009 Page 11 of 13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.