My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 101409
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 101409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:41:23 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 10:43:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/14/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chair Pearce agreed and asked to see it widened as well. She noted that she likes the <br />fact that the design is very pedestrian-oriented. She also appreciated the addition of the <br />bike parking and noted that she had mentioned it at the workshop. She indicated that <br />she noticed at the Santa Rita Safeway that many people jam their bikes up in front and <br />she inquired if additional bike parking could be provided in front if the sidewalk is <br />widened. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that this is the only place where bike parking exists and <br />recommended that it also be added by Shops 5 or 7 or some other appropriate places. <br />Chair Pearce agreed. <br />6. Staff requests the Planning Commission’s comment and direction on the proposed <br />location of the service station. <br />Commissioner O’Connor stated that he would have liked to see the service station <br />rotated 90 degrees but it is not feasible. He indicated that he was much more pleased <br />with its current placement and believes it is not as prominent as it was before. <br />Commissioner Narum agreed. <br />Commissioner Olson stated that he felt it is also an improvement, the design is terrific <br />and outstanding, and it does not even look like a service station. <br />Commissioner Blank stated that he believes it is a much improved location as well and <br />also believes that pending some results from staff, it will focus and be an amenity for <br />people who use the center. He added that while they have other issues associated with <br />it, he does not think it will be the draw that it would have been in its previous location. <br />Commissioner Pentin agreed. He indicated that he thinks the location is placed well on <br />the property and its design is excellent. He added that he does not believe it will be an <br />attraction from Bernal Corners than it would have been had it been up on the corner. <br />Chair Pearce stated that as she had voiced at the previous workshop, she cannot <br />support the gas station as it would turn this from a neighborhood amenity to more of a <br />freeway attraction. She added that it is not her idea for a gateway as it changes the <br />nature of the shopping center; however, If she had to choose, she would prefer the <br />location it is at now. <br />7. Is the Planning Commission satisfied with the overall architectural design of the retail <br />buildings, colors, materials, detailing, etc.? <br />Commissioner Pentin stated that this is the first he has seen the architectural designs. <br />He indicated that he loves the look and different elements used; the down lights, the <br />goosenecks, as well as the 360-degree design as he was really concerned with seeing <br />the backs of the buildings. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 14, 2009 Page 21 of 25 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.